Skip to main content

NhaD type sodium/proton-antiporter of Halomonas elongata: a salt stress response mechanism in marine habitats?



Sodium/proton-antiporters (Nha) are known to play an important role in pH- and Na+-homeostasis. In microorganisms several types with different capacity, affinity and selectivity for Na+ and Li+ exist. The homeostasis system of E. coli, NhaA and NhaB, is well researched, but the function of other types of Na+/H+-antiporters like NhaD is yet to be fully understood. Since several antiporters play an important role at various points in the physiology of higher organisms, one can speculate that the main functions of some of those procaryotic antiporters differ from pH- and Na+-homeostasis.


This study investigates the function and regulation of a gene encoding for a NhaD type antiporter which was discovered in the halophilic eubacterium Halomonas elongata.

The deduced primary amino acid sequence of the abovementioned gene showed more than 60% identity to known antiporters of the NhaD type from Alkalimonas amylolytica, Shewanella oneidensis and several other marine organisms of the γ-Proteobacteria. Evidence was found for a dual regulation of H. elongata NhaD expression. The gene was cloned and expressed in E. coli. Antiporter deficient NaCl and LiCl sensitive E. coli mutants EP432 and KNabc were partially complemented by a plasmid carrying the H. elongata nhaD gene. Surprisingly the LiCl sensitivity of E. coli strain DH5α having a complete homeostasis system was increased when NhaD was co-expressed.


Since NhaD is an antiporter known so far only from halophilic or haloalcaliphilic Proteobacteria one can speculate that this type of antiporter provides a special mechanism for adaptation to marine habitats. As was already speculated – though without supporting data – and substantiated in this study this might be active Na+-import for osmoregulatory purposes.


Halomonas elongata is a moderately halophilic eubacterium which thrives under a broad range of salinities [1] and has its growth optimum at 3% NaCl (w/v) (500 mM) [2]. The organism is known for the production of the compatible solutes ectoine and hydroxyectoine, which are accumulated for adaptation to high environmental salinity and correspondingly high osmotic activity [3, 4].

In Bacteria adaptation of intracellular to extracellular osmotic activity is also coupled to a range of physiological properties like internal pH [5] and ionic strength [6], but also heat- and cold-tolerance. Especially Na+- and pH-homeostasis play an important role in physiology and are closely linked. Since sodium/proton-antiporters have a central function in both processes they are found in the cytoplasmic membranes of almost all cells [7, 8] with Clostridium fervidum being the only known exception so far [9].

According to present knowledge, in Bacteria Na+/H+-antiporters serve three main functions:

1) Conversion of a proton gradient into a sodium gradient. This is necessary for the import of Na+-co-transported substrates and function of some flagellar motors.

2) Discharging of Na+ and Li+ from the cytoplasm.

3) Regulation of internal pH in alkaline environments.

As reviewed [10] a system consisting of a high capacity, low affinity type Na+/H+-antiporter NhaA in concert with a low capacity, high affinity antiporter, NhaB [11], is sufficient for bacteria from a diversity of environments to adapt to a broad spectrum of moderate salinities. Even then NhaA is the key system, NhaB being only essential when NhaA is absent. E. coli Na+/H+-antiporters NhaA and NhaB are well researched model systems [7] and several antiporter deletion mutants are at hand [12, 11, 13].

The exact role of Na+/H+-antiporters of other types is not completely understood so far. For example in the marine human pathogen Vibrio cholerae wildtype Na+- and Li+-tolerance is only displayed when all four different antiporters (NhaA, NhaB, NhaC and NhaD) and a NADH-quinon-oxidoreductase are present [14]. Conserved polar residues of V. cholerae NhaD antiporters have been identified and their function analyzed [15]. NhaD is also found in other pathogenic species but not in non-pathogens from the same phyla [16] which might rise speculations of NhaD being a pathogenicity marker. Recent research into NhaD type antiporter from Alkalimonas amylolytica revealed that this antiporter helps in adaptation to alkaline environments [17], thus contradicting the idea that NhaD might be a marker for pathogens. A paradoxical mode of NhaD operation suggests that NhaD type antiporters might be part of regulation in adaptation to saline environments.

For Halomonadaceae no Na+/H+-antiporters were known so far. Finding an NhaD type antiporter in the moderately halophilic non-pathogenic H. elongata adds further proof to the idea, that this type is rather involved in (marine) osmoregulation.


NhaD sequence

Using wobble primers in a touchdown PCR on H. elongata genomic DNA we discovered a DNA sequence with a high similarity to the translation product of Vibrio parahaemolyticus nhaD, a novel type sodium/proton antiporter [12]. Using standard chromosome walking techniques and inverted PCR we acquired a sequence approximately 2800 base pairs (bp) long (full sequence available at the EMBL nucleotide sequence database, AM167899). The sequence contains at least one open reading frame (ORF) preceeded by a Shine-Dalgarno sequence (SD) [18]. The ORF was designated nhaD due to the high similarity of the 412 amino acid (AA) transcription product with NhaD type antiporters of several marine γ-Proteobacteria (Fig. 1). Two putative promoter regions were found upstream of the ORF (Fig. 2). One of them is similar to E. coli σ 70 type housekeeping promoters and the other one resembles a rpoH dependent heat shock promoter (Tab. 1).

Table 1 Promoter comparison
Figure 1

sequence Alignment. Multi sequence alignment of H. elongata NhaD and NhaD type antiporters of other γ-proteo bacteria. Hal_elon Halomonas elongata, Alkal_am Alkalimonas amylolytica, Idiom_lo Idiomarina loihiensis, Shewa_on Shewanella oneidensis, Photo_pr Photobacterium profundum, Vibr_ch Vibrio cholerae, Vibr_par Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Alignment was done with the MULTALIN [32] sequence tool. Spans with high homology (at least six of the seven organisms show the same residue) are given in black, spans with low or no homology in gray. Similar residues are noted in the consensus sequence as follows: ! is I, V; $ is L, M; % is F, Y; # any one of N, D, Q, E, B, Z. Underlined residues in the H. elongata sequence are probably not expressed in vivo and are not expressed in the reconstitution experiments.

Figure 2

H. elongata nhaD sequence. Part of the DNA sequence of H. elongata nhaD and regions upstream and downstream of the coding region: Bases are numbered on the left (numbering according to full sequence as found in EMBL nucleotide sequence database: AM167899), the deduced AA sequence is below the codons and numbered on the right. -35a, -10a putative rpoH dependent promoter, SDa putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence after rpoH and two putative start codons ATG. -35b and -10b putative σ70 housekeeping promoter, SDb alternative Shine-Dalgarno sequence and atgpossible start codon. Note that the last start codon is the only one usable for expression under control of both putative promoters. tgastopp codons in the first *, second *2 and third *3 reading frame. →← inverted repeat, the downstream sequence lacks an AT-rich motive, therefore this is probably not significant for transcription termination. Note also that there are two possible starting points for transcription and translation, yielding proteines of 483 or 412 residues. Translation starting after SDb would yield only the 412 AA protein. On the other hand SDa would only be functional only for the rpoH dependent promoter.

Between the putative rpoH and σ70 dependent promoters a second SD was detected. An ORF using the same reading frame would yield a putative alternate NhaD product which has an N-terminus of additional 71 AAs and would yield a total of 483 AAs.

The putative 412 AA protein has a calculated Mr of 45.7 kDa and a pI of 8.52. In the sequence 48 residues are basic, 22 are acidic and another 42 are uncharged polar, yielding a total of 112 (27%) hydrophilic and 300 (73%) hydrophobic residues. This complies with the overall composition of integral membrane proteins. The most abundant residues are 44 Leu (13%), 41 Val (10%) and 38 Ala (9.2%). Least abundant are Cys (4/1%), His (5/1.2%) and Gln (6/1.5%). Hydropathy plots show 10 to 12 possible transmembrane regions (data not shown). The data are very similar to those from V. parahaemolyticus NhaD [12] and support the concept that our protein is of the NhaD type.

NhaD homologues

A BLAST search yielded seven bacterial sodium/proton antiporters of the NhaD type from Proteobacteria: Alkalimonas amylolytica (AY962404), Shewanella oneidensis (AE015538, putative), Idiomarina loihiensis (AE017340, putative), Photobacterium profundum (CR378677, putative), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (AB006008), Vibrio cholerae (AF331042) and Vibrio vulnificus (AE016812 – all accession numbers taken from NCBI database). Several additional Na+/H+-antiporters and transport proteins for other metals show significantly lower similarities.

Multiple sequence alignment with NhaD type antiporters revealed 297 identical residues (70% based on the 412 residues of the H. elongata protein) and 311 highly conserved residues (76%) (Fig. 2). All of those organisms are γ-proteobacteria, six of marine origin and one soda lake isolate, A. amylolytica.

We also gained part of a DNA sequence of haloalkaliphilic Lake Bogoria Isolate 25B1 [19], supposedly a member of the Family Halomonadaceae, which shows 95% identity to H. elongata nhaD on DNA level and therefore has equally high homology in the putative AA sequence (data not shown).

Complementation of E. coliEP432 and Knabc

We constructed an expression vector from pUC18 where the β-lactamase is replaced in-frame by nhaD and named it pUCHelNhaD (Fig. 3). We decided to use the ORF yielding a 412AA product for two reasons: First dual control (see below) indicates that two promoters might be involved in nhaD expression, one being a stress promoter. The putative σ70 housekeeping promoter (Fig. 2) would yield this (shorter) protein. Secondly, our product is analogous to the functional V. parahaemolyticus NhaD described by Nozaki and coworkers [12]. This is especially true for the ATG start codon.

Figure 3

Expression vector. Expression vector pUCHelNhaD. H. elongata nhaD (nhaD) was amplified by PCR using mutated primers that integrate the nhaD start codon in a constructed Nde I restriction site. The gene was subsequently cloned between the Nde I and Aat II enzyme sites of pUC18. The pUC18 β-lactamase gene is destroyed by this insertion, and in frame replaced by nhaD. Expression of NhaD is controlled by the lac operator (lac). Amp depicts the gene encoding for ampiciline resistance, ori marks the E. coli replication origin.

E. coli mutants EP432 (nhaA and nhaB deleted in frame) and KNabc (nhaA, nhaB and chaA destroyed by insertion of omega cassettes) were transformed with pUCHelNhaD (complemented strain) and pUC18 (control). NhaD expression was under control of the pUC18 lac promoter. We decided to use both strains to assess possible differences in complementation by NhaD due to method of deletion and influence of the sodium extrusion system ChaA.

First we tested growth on solid minimal medium and compared colony size of both mutants with E. coli XL1-Blue and H. elongata (Fig. 4). In the absence of NaCl (traces from media components available) XL1blue grew well with LiCl concentrations below 38 mM. Growth was also observed at up to 150 mM, but colonies are drastically smaller. Complemented EP432 and the control both grew well only without LiCl, and did not show growth at concentrations higher than 4.8 mM. In sharp contrast to this H. elongata did not grow at all with less than 150 mM LiCl and only traces of NaCl available.

Figure 4

Growth on solid minimal agar. Colonies of E. coli strains XL1 Blue, EP432 pUC18 (control) and EP432 pUCHelNhaD and also of H. elongata were grown on MM63 minimal agar supplied with trace elements and vitamins for two days at 37°C. First set of pictures shows growth without NaCl (< 0.01% NaCl, 2 mM) due to media component impurities) under increasing LiCl concentrations, second set of pictures is growth under different salinities in the absence of LiCl. Concentrations of NaCl and LiCl are indicated above individual bars. No growth is marked with a white X (some artifacts due to toothpick transfer are visible). LiCl tolerance is drastically reduced in EP432 and this is not clearly counteracted by the presence of pUCHelNhaD although we observed slightly larger colonies. Salt tolerance is also reduced in this organism and only poorly compensated by expression of H. elongata NhaD. The halophilic H. elongata does not grow without salt and a corresponding osmotic activity in the growth medium. Apparently LiCl has no lethal effect on H. elongata at concentrations of 150 and 300 mM in solid medium and seems to partially replace the organism's sodium requirements.

E. coli wild type is known to grow on minimal medium containing up to to 3% NaCl (w/v) (500 mM) and, in the presence of solutes, to tolerate salinities up to 5% (w/v) (666 mM). On MM63 supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) yeast extract we observed growth for XL1-Blue but it was very poor at 3 and 4% NaCl (w/v) (500 and 666 mM). At 1% and 2% (w/v) (166 and 333 mM) the complemented EP432 strain and the control did grow, but colonies were smaller than those of XL1-Blue with the control colonies being even slightly smaller. At 3% (w/v) (500 mM) the complemented strain showed weak growth where the control did not.

When grown in liquid medium (Fig. 5 and 6, Tab. 2 and 3) enhanced growth was observed for complemented EP432 pUCHelNhaD and KNabc pUCHelNhaD compared to the controls carrying pUC18. We observed higher growth rates, shorter lag phases, higher OD maxima or a combination of those factors. Growth enhancement was more drastic in minimal medium (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, in complex medium (Fig. 5A) growth was comparably poor. We attribute this to the high content of Na+-co-transported substrates (see discussion). Even in the presence of only traces of NaCl, growth of the transport deficient EP432 was reduced compared to the complemented strain. The observed worse growth in KNabc compared to EP432 was to be expected since the latter strain still has the ChaA Na+-extrusion system.

Figure 5

Growth of E. coli EP432. Growth in liquid Medium: E. coli strains EP432 pUC18 (open, control) and EP432 pUCHelNhaD (solid, NhaD) were grown at 0% 1) (circles) and 3% (500 mM, squares) salinity (w/v) in A) LB medium and B) MM63 minimal medium. Additionally growth data for XL1 Blue (WT, triangles) are shown for 0%. 1) Due to impurities of media components there are still traces of NaCl (<0.01%, 2 mM) in the medium.

Figure 6

Growth of E. coli Knabc. Growth in liquid Medium: A) Growth curves of E. coli strains KNabc pUC18 (open Symbols, control) and KNabc pUCHelNhaD (black Symbols, NhaD) at 0% 1) (circles) and 3% (500 mM, squares) salinity (w/v) in MM63 minimal medium. Additionally growth data for XL1 Blue (WT, triangles) are shown for 0%. 1) Due to impurities of media components are still traces of NaCl (< 0.01%, 2 mM) in the medium.

Table 2 Growth of E. coli EP432
Table 3 Growth of E. coli Knabc

LiCl tolerance was also tested in shaking cultures. According to the data on solid medium no growth was observed at more than 4.8 mM LiCl. Below this concentration no significant differences in growth were observed between EP432 pUCHelNhaD and EP432 pUC18 or KNabc pUCHelNhaD and KNabc pUC18; this is true for pH values ranging from 7 to 9 (data not shown). We also tried to complement the NhaA deficient E. coli strain NM81 but results were poorly reproducible (not shown).

Li+-sensitivity of E. coliDH5α

H. elongata is able to tolerate Li+-concentrations of up to 3 M depending on pH (Tab. 4). Therefore, E. coli DH5α where the full set of Na+-extrusion systems including NhaA, NhaB and ChaA is present was transformed with pUCHelNhaD and pUC18 (control). Both strains were grown at 500 mM (3% (w/v)) NaCl and at 300 mM NaCl/200 mM LiCl to test for enhanced Li+ tolerance. As can be seen in Fig. 7 and Tab. 5, in the absence of LiCl there appeared to be only little difference in growth between the two strains and in the presence of LiCl growth of the control is inhibited. To our surprise expression of H. elongata NhaD did not increase LiCl tolerance in an E. coli having a functional set of Na+/H+ antiporters. In contrast to our expectations next to no growth was observed in E. coli DH5α pUCHelNhaD, thus clearly indicating that NhaD is able to import Li+-ions into the cells. The same observations were made at a pH of 8.5 (in contrast to pH 7.3 of MM63) which is close to the average marine pH (data not shown). As can be seen in Tab. 6 lithium sensitivity is higher for the NhaD producing DH5a throughout the whole spectrum of pH and Li+ concentrations used. Regrettably growth rates are not well reproducible since the cells tended to aggregate at low phosphate and higher Li+ concentrations.

Table 4 Li+-tolerance of H. elongata
Table 5 Li+-sensitivity of E. coli DH5α
Table 6 pH dependend Li+-sensitivity of E. coli DH5α
Figure 7

Li+-sensitivity of E. coli DH5α. A) Growth curves of E. coli strains DH5α pUC18 (open Symbols, control) and DH5α (black Symbols, NhaD) at 500 mM (3% (w/v)) NaCl (circles) and 300 mM NaCl/200 mM LiCl (squares) in MM63 minimal medium. Additionally growth data for XL1 Blue (WT, triangles) are shown for 0% salinity.

Expression analysis

Analysis of mRNA shows an enhanced level of expression for H. elongata nhaD under conditions of a hyperosmotic shock (Fig. 8). Growth rates are similar for cultures under hypo-, iso- and hypersaline shock conditions but levels of nhaD mRNA rise only when the organism is subjected to a higher salinity.

Figure 8

NhaD expression in H. elongata. nhaD expression in H. elongata in complex Medium at different salinities: An overnight culture of H. elongata in K complex medium (5% salinity (w/v) (500 mM)) was transferred to the same medium at 2% (diamonds, 333 mM), 5% (circles, 833 mM) and 10% (1666 mM) salinity (w/v) (triangles/solid column) giving hypoosmotic, equiosmotic and hyperosmotic conditions respectively. Errors for mean of triplicate measurements is given. While growth curves and growth rates are similar, nhaD expression differs drastically for different media. After 10 minutes (lag-phase) expression levels are the same under hypo- and equiosmotic conditions. It increases by a factor of four under hyperosmotic conditions. In the logarithmic growth phase nhaD expression levels decrease for all media.


NhaD, an antiporter typical for marine bacteria?

Sodium proton antiporters are ubiquitous not only in Bacteria but also in Archaea and Eucaria [10] with Clostridium fervidum being the only known exception so far [9]. Therefore finding a Na+/H+-antiporter in H. elongata was not too surprising. Sequence comparison indicates strongly that the antiporter belongs to the NhaD family (Fig. 1). Highly conserved and proposedly crucial residues Asp(369) and Thr(370), which correspond to positions 288 and 289 in [20], and other conserved polar amino acids [21] are present in the H. elongata protein.

The interesting fact is that most antiporters of this family known so far are either found in marine bacteria belonging to the γ-subgroup of Proteobacteria. Haloalkaliphilic A. amylolytica and Lake Bogoria Isolate 25B1 might be regarded as exceptions, but we have to keep in mind that marine habitats have a pH of about 8.2 and are therefore also slightly alkaliphilic. Thus, one might speculate whether the NhaD-type antiporter is specific for marine bacteria and possibly represents a special mechanism to adapt to moderate salinities of marine habitats. Complementation and expression studies, which are discussed in detail later, do not support this. We do not observe an enhanced salt tolerance for E. coli wildtype (MM63 with 4% NaCl (w/v) (666 mM) and 37°C, data not shown) and we observed enhanced expression of NhaD only after a hyperosmotic shock to salinities well above those of sea water (Fig. 8). Nevertheless, this is no contradiction to NhaD being specific for marine bacteria. We have to take into consideration coastal areas which can dry out periodically, thus resulting in higher salinities than the usual 3% (w/v) (500 mM) for seawater. In such situations it could prove useful to express a special system to extrude Na+ from the cytoplasm to support adaptation to salinities above 3%.

Further physiological data support the theory that NhaD is typical for marine or haloalkaliphilic habitats but indicate a different function.

Complementation of antiporter deficient E. coli

As stated above, we chose to express the protein starting with the ATG at position 803 rather than 589 (Fig. 2) for two reasons. Firstly expression under control of the putative housekeeping promoter would yield this product and secondly the amino acid sequence reported for V. parahaemolyticus [12] and Fig. 1), is an equivalent to the shorter protein and completely functional. A similar observation was made by Ostroumov and her group [20] for V. cholerae NhaD who also successfully expressed a shorter ORF but gained a functional protein.

We also preferred using the pUC18 lac promoter for expression control rather than the putative promoter sequences upstream of the ORF because the promoter seems to be only induced at a reasonable level when the organism undergoes a hyperosmotic shock (Fig. 8) and also because we did observe that not all H. elongata promoters do work in E. coli (unpublished).

Complementation with H. elongata NhaD did not restore the lithium and sodium tolerance to the level of a wild type E. coli (Fig. 4). This might be due to incompatibility of this system to the host or simply due to lower numbers of antiporters in comparison to the wild type. The fact is that under given conditions NhaD does only poorly replace the NhaA/NhaB system, but nevertheless, we observed significantly enhanced growth when the antiporter was expressed in NhaA and NhaB deficient strains EP432 (Fig. 5, Tab. 2) and KNabc (Fig. 6, Tab. 3). Especially KNabc does not show any growth at 3% salinity (w/v) (500 mM) in mineral medium MM63 but has a reasonable growth rate when complemented (Fig. 6, Tab. 3). Effects are similar for EP432 in MM63 (Fig. 5A). This demonstrates that Halomonas elongata NhaD can replace the E. coli sodium/proton antiporters at elevated salinities.

To our surprise growth was equally poor in complex medium (Fig. 5A, Tab. 2) for both the control and the complemented EP432 at no (0% (w/v)) and elevated (3%) salinity (500 mM). We attribute this to the high amount of Na+-co-transported substarates in LB medium. A less efficient or incompatible export system for Na+ might consume more energy, which could otherwise be used for growth, or might result in a high intracellular sodium concentration which damages the organism. Again, this shows that NhaD is only a poor replacement for the A/B system.

nhaD expression in H. elongata

Quantification of mRNA indicates that we have a certain housekeeping level of nhaD expression at all salinities. This basic level is enhanced by a factor of four within a few minutes after a hyperosmotic shock (Fig. 8). Considering that we worked with a starting salinity above that of sea water and ended up doubling this salinity, as discussed above this indicates that NhaD is not needed in large amounts at marine salinities. The expression level seems to drop after one hour in a fresh culture medium, even below the starting level and not depending on shock conditions, but since we had to use 16S rRNA as a standard, this is easily explained with variations in rRNA levels at those later time points [22].

These findings comply with the two putative promoter structures upstream of the open reading frame (Tab. 1). One shows significant similarity to sigma70 dependent housekeeping promoters [23] which are also reported for H. elongata ([24] and recent unpublished data). The other one is reasonably similar to rpoH dependent stress promoters. For V. parahaemolyticus also two putative promoters are given [12], but here only two sigma70-like structures were found. So far no further expression studies for NhaD type sodium/proton-antiporters are reported, this definitely needs deeper investigation.

NhaD a Na+-import system?

Several publications reporting Na+ export activity (e.g. [21, 17]) and our own observations notwithstanding, we suppose that NhaD is rather a sodium import system than an export system. This agrees with an idea of active Na+ import [16], though we disagree with the hypothesis that NhaD is a pathogenicity marker. We do not see concomitance of pathogenicity and NhaD, especially with regard to H. elongata and the haloalkaliphiles.

In accordance with others (e.g. [12]) we find NhaD can partially compensate for the NhaA/NhaB system in a deficient organism, but as can be seen from the physiological data in this study, it is only a poor replacement. NhaD does also not confer enhanced salt tolerance on a non-halotolerant organism. In addition to this, by expressing NhaD in an E. coli which still has both antiporters A and B, Li+ sensitivity is increased (Fig. 7, Tab. 5, Tab. 6). One might argue that this is caused by Li+ leaking through NhaD, but leakage would also occur through NhaA, NhaB and other channels and porines. Thus, leakage through one additional antiporter would not explain the drastic effect observed.

This sensitivity under conditions of heterologous expression complies with observations from Vibrio NhaD deletion mutants [16], which are less susceptible to lithium under alkaline conditions. (This referring to unpublished results only, no supporting data are given and no further data are published yet.) Both findings indicate import of small monovalent cations via NhaD.

Active Na+ import would make sense on a regulatory level, but this is highly speculative especially when we take riboswich elements into consideration (Reviewed in [25]). Here we touch a field of regulatory mechanismns on a level of interactions of nucleic acids with small metabolites which we only begin to understand in detail.


Although kinetics are yet to be analyzed, with the results discussed in this paper we give strong evidence that nhaD encodes for a functional sodium/proton-antiporter in H. elongata. Sequence comparison clearly indicates that this antiporter belongs to the NhaD type, which is so far found exclusively in cell membranes of marine/haloalkaliphilic γ-proteobacteria. Even an extensive database search does not yield any known or putative (transport) protein or open reading frame with significant similarity to classify for this type. This is true for other groups of Bacteria as well as for Archea or Eucaria. Therefore, this is definitely an indicator for NhaD being part of the adaptation mechanism for marine/haloalkaline habitats. Further research has to be done to clarify the exact role of this antiporter type. Since NhaD is probably never found as the sole antiporter of an organism this might prove an arduous task.

Identifying genes encoding for NhaA type or further antiporters in H. elongata may give additional support to this thesis. This might also help understanding why H. elongata and probably other halophilic or marine organisms have a higher lithium tolerance and may even use lithium instead of sodium for a minimum requirement of cations in the growth medium, especially since NhaD seems to be responsible for Na+ (and Li+) import.

Considering the results so far we propose that NhaD is a system needed in a relatively low amount under housekeeping conditions but with enhanced levels of expression under shock and/or stress conditions. Especially an enhancement of Lithium sensitivity indicates that NhaD is rather a Na+-import system and might be involved in activation of Na+-sensitive promoters or control of riboswitches during osmoadaptation.


Organisms and cultivation

Organisms are shown in Tab. 7 with genotype and references included. If not stated otherwise Halomonas elongata DSM2581T was cultivated at 37°C and pH 7.3 in complex medium K [26] and modified minimal medium MM63 [27], using glycerol as carbon source. E. coli strains were grown in modified Luria-Bertani (LB) [28] and MM63, also at 37°C and pH 7.3. Salinity and LiCl content of media were modified as necessary. For experiments concerning the range and pH dependency of Li+-tolerance a Tris/HCl-buffered version of MM63 with low (25 mM) phosphate content was used to prevent lithium-phosphate precipitation at high Li+-concentrations.

Table 7 Bacterial strains used in this study

To pUC18 and pUCHelNhaD bearing strains we added 50 μg/ml ampicillin and 100 mM IPTG to induce nhaD expression (or as control). Cultivation was done in 250 ml shaking flasks containing 50 ml medium at 180 rpm or on solid medium containing 1.5% (w/v) agar. Growth was tracked in flasks equipped for optical density (OD) measurements. OD was determined at 600 nm and corrected according to the method of Dalgaard et al. [29].

Sequence determination

Part of the sequence was found using wobble primers (5'-GAC GTC GCC GTC GSC GTS ATC ATH-3' and 5'-GGC GAA GGC GAT GAT SAG GAA RTY-3', with H = A, C or T; R= A or G; S= G or C; Y= C or T) in a touchdown PCR on H. elongata genomic DNA. Sequence information was completed using standard chromosome walking techniques and inverse PCR. Sequencing reactions were carried out by GATC (Konstanz, Germany).

Complementation of antiporter deficient E. coli

H. elongata nhaD was amplified by PCR using Pwo DNA polymerase (Roche) and primers HeNxpF1 (5'-GAAACTGCAtATGCGCAAGTCC-3') and HeNxpR1 (5'-CGCACGACgtcGGCTGGAAG-3'). In HeNxpF1 a NdeI restriction site (underlined) was introduced (C changed to t, lower case) and likewise in HeNxpR1 an AatII site. (TGG to gtc). The β-lactamase gene in pUC18 was replaced inframe by H. elongata nhaD for expression under control of the lac-operator yielding vector pUCHelNhaD (Fig. 3). E. coli DH5a and XL1 blue were used for cloning purposes, strains NM81, EP432 and KNabc were then transformed with the plasmid. pUC18 was used as a control.

Expression analysis

RNA was extracted from H. elongata culture samples with the E.Z.N.A.™ Bacterial RNA kit (Peqlab). cDNA was constructed according to the protocol of Bertioli and Burrows [30]. nhaD cDNA was quantified by real-time PCR in a GeneAmp® 5700 System (Applied Biosystems) measuring SYBR®-Green fluorescence.

Computer methods

Data base research was done using the NCBI Blast interface [31]. Multiple sequence alignment was carried out with MULTALIN [32] and CLUSTHALW [33]. Promoter analysis was done using the SEARCHLAUNCHER interface [34]. Hydropathy plots were also done via SEARCHLAUNCHER according to the method of Eisenberg et al. [35].


  1. 1.

    Vreeland RH: The family Halomonadaceae. The procaryotes. Edited by: Starr MP et al. 1980, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sauer T: Untersuchungen zur Nutzung von Halomonas elongata für die Gewinnung kompatibler Solute. PhD Thesis. 1995, University Bonn, Microbiology

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Galinski EA, Pfeiffer HP, Trüper HG: 1,4,5,6-Tetrahydro-2-methyl-4-pyrimidinecarboxylic acid. A novel cyclic amino acid from halophilic phototrophic bacteria of the genus Ectothiorhodospira. Eur J Biochem. 1985, 149: 135-139. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08903.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Roberts MF: Organic compatible solutes of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms. Saline Systems. 2005, 1: 5-10.1186/1746-1448-1-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Booth IR: Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1985, 49: 359-378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Richey B, Cayley DS, Mossing MC, Kolka C, Anderson CF, Farrar TC, Record MTJ: Variability of the intracellular ionic environment of Escherichia coli. Differences between in vitro and in vivo effects of ion concentrations on protein-DNA interactions and gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1987, 262: 7157-7164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Padan E, Schuldiner S: Na+/H+ antiporters, molecular devices that couple the Na+ and H+ circulation in cells. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1993, 25: 647-669.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Puceat M: pHi regulatory ion transporters: an update on structure, regulation and cell function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999, 55: 1216-1229. 10.1007/s000180050368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Speelmans G, Poolman B, Abee T, Konings WN: Energy transduction in the thermophilic anaerobic bacterium Clostridium fervidus is exclusively coupled to sodium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 7975-7979. 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Padan E, Venturi M, Gerchman Y, Dover N: Na(+)/H(+) antiporters. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001, 1505: 144-157. 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00284-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pinner E, Kotler Y, Padan E, Schuldiner S: Physiological role of nhaB, a specific Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 1729-1734.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nozaki K, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T: A new Na+/H+ antiporter, NhaD, of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1369: 213-220. 10.1016/S0005-2736(97)00223-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Padan E, Maisler N, Taglicht D, Karpel R, Schuldiner S: Deletion of ant in Escherichia coli reveals its function in adaptation to high salinity and an alternative Na+/H+ antiporter system(s). J Biol Chem. 1989, 264: 20297-20302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Herz K, Vimont S, Padan E, Berche P: Roles of NhaA, NhaB, and NhaD Na+/H+ antiporters in survival of Vibrio cholerae in a saline environment. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 1236-1244. 10.1128/JB.185.4.1236-1244.2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Habibian R, Dzioba J, Barrett J, Galperin MY, Loewen PC, Dibrov P: Functional analysis of conserved polar residues in Vc-NhaD, Na+/H+ antiporter of Vibrio cholerae. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 39637-39643. 10.1074/jbc.M509328200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dibrov P: The sodium cycle in Vibrio cholerae: riddles in the dark. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2005, 70: 150-153. 10.1007/s10541-005-0094-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu J, Xue Y, Wang Q, Wei Y, Swartz TH, Hicks DB, Ito M, Ma Y, Krulwich TA: The activity profile of the NhaD-type Na+(Li+)/H+ antiporter from the soda Lake Haloalkaliphile Alkalimonas amylolytica is adaptive for the extreme environment. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 7589-7595. 10.1128/JB.187.22.7589-7595.2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shine J, Dalgarno L: The 3'-terminal sequence of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA: complementarity to nonsense triplets and ribosome binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974, 71: 1342-1346. 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Duckworth AW, Grant WD, Jones BE, Meijer D, Marquez MC, Ventosa A: Halomonas magadii sp. nov., a new member of the genus Halomonas, isolated from a soda lake of the East African Rift Valley. Extremophiles. 2000, 4: 53-60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ostroumov E, Dzioba J, Loewen PC, Dibrov P: Asp(344) and Thr(345) are critical for cation exchange mediated by NhaD, Na(+)/H(+) antiporter of Vibrio cholerae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1564: 99-106. 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00407-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T: Physiological roles of three Na+/H+ antiporters in the halophilic bacterium Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol Immunol. 2005, 49: 711-719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nierlich DP: Regulation of ribonucleic acid synthesis in growing bacterial cells. I. Control over the total rate of RNA synthesis. J Mol Biol. 1972, 72: 751-764. 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90189-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wösten MMSM: Eubacterial sigma-factors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998, 22: 127-150. 10.1016/S0168-6445(98)00011-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Göller K: Identifizierung und Charakterisierung des Ectoin-Genclusters in Halomonas elongata. PhD Thesis. 1999, University Bonn, Microbiology

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Barrick JE, Corbino KA, Winkler WC, Nahvi A, Mandal M, Collins J, Lee M, Roth A, Sudarsan N, Jona I, Wickiser JK, Breaker RR: New RNA motifs suggest an expanded scope for riboswitches in bacterial genetic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 6421-6426. 10.1073/pnas.0308014101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Severin J, Wohlfahrt A, Galinski EA: The role of recently discovered tetrahydropyrimidines or the osmoadaptation of halophilic eubacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1992, 138: 1629-6426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Larsen PI, Sydnes LK, Landfald B, Strom AR: Osmoregulation in Escherichia coli by accumulation of organic osmolytes: betaines, glutamic acid, and trehalose. Arch Microbiol. 1987, 147: 1-7. 10.1007/BF00492896.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bertani G: Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951, 62: 293-300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dalgaard P, Ross T, Kamperman L, Neumeyer K, McMeekin TA: Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994, 23: 391-404. 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90165-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bertioli DJ, Burrows PR: A simple RACE method based on CTAB precipitation. Meth Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 5: 118-121.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    NCBI BLAST interface. []

  32. 32.

    Multalin interface. []

  33. 33.

    Clusthal W interface. []

  34. 34.

    Searchlauncher interface. []

  35. 35.

    Eisenberg D, Schwarz E, Komaromy M, Wall R: Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J Mol Biol. 1984, 179: 125-142. 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90309-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hanahan D: Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983, 166: 557-580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bullock AD, Fernandez JM, Short JM: XL1-Blue: A high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strain with beta-Galactosidase selection. BioTechniques. 1987, 5: 376-378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Etana Padan and her group, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, for kindly providing E. coli mutants EP432 and NM81. We also thank Prof. Dr. Tomofusa Tsuchiya and his group, Okayama University, Japan, for kindly providing E. coli mutant KNabc. Additional thanks go to Dr. Jörg Kunte and his group, University of Bonn and Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung (BAM), Berlin, for many fruitful discussions. We also thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for granting Mattthias Kurz a fellowship in the Graduiertenkolleg Membranproteine, Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster, Germany.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Kurz.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

Matthias Kurz worked on the sequence and most of the physiological experiments including expression and promoter analysis. Anika Brünig constructed the vector pUCHelNhaD and helped in the complementation experiments. Erwin Galinski helped in the conception and design of the experimental setup and in data analysis.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurz, M., Brünig, A.N. & Galinski, E.A. NhaD type sodium/proton-antiporter of Halomonas elongata: a salt stress response mechanism in marine habitats?. Aquat. Biosyst. 2, 10 (2006).

Download citation


  • Putative Promoter
  • Hyperosmotic Shock
  • Hydropathy Plot
  • Medium MM63
  • Strain NM81