Skip to main content

The seasonal distribution, diel vertical distribution and feeding behavior of Paraeuchaeta concinna in the shallow subtropical coastal waters of eastern Hong Kong



Predatory copepods of the family Euchaetidae are widely distributed in polar, temperate, subtropical and tropical oceans. Paraeuchaeta concinna is the most abundant Euchaetidae in the subtropical coastal seas of Hong Kong and southern China. However, compared to Euchaetidae species in temperate and polar regions, relatively little information is available on the ecology of P. concinna and other Euchaetidae species in the subtropical oceans. This paper provides information on the seasonal abundance of P. concinna in the coastal seas of eastern Hong Kong. The diel vertical distribution of P. concinna, feeding behavior, and predation impact on mesozooplankton in eastern Hong Kong were also investigated.


P. concinna is most abundant in winter and spring. Their abundance decreases shoreward, and densities are generally higher in the open waters of eastern Hong Kong than in the inner parts of Mirs Bay and Tolo Harbour. P. concinna exhibits both diel vertical migration and diel feeding rhythms in Mirs Bay. P. concinna females show strong preference for the copepods of the genera Acrocalanus, Paracalanus, and Parvocalanus, and remove ~4% of their standing stocks daily.


The low abundance of P. concinna during most of the year suggests it is not indigenous to coastal seas of eastern Hong Kong. P. concinna performs diel vertical migration, most likely as a strategy to avoid visual predation. Gut content analysis showed that Acrocalanus, Paracalanus, and Parvocalanus are highly preferred prey of P. concinna. A daily predation impact of ~4% of the standing stocks of Acrocalanus, Paracalanus, and Parvocalanus suggests that P. concinna may play an important role in regulating the populations of these small copepods in Mirs Bay, especially during winter and spring.


Marine calanoid copepods of the family Euchaetidae are widely distributed in polar, temperate, subtropical and tropical oceans, typically large in size (2–12 mm), and primarily predaceous [1]. Predation by Euchaetidae is known to significantly affect the abundance and distribution of mesozooplankton stocks in pelagic ecosystems [26]. Among Euchaetidae, the genera Paraeuchaeta and Euchaeta, which occur mainly in deep temperate and arctic waters, have been studied extensively [714]. Various patterns of diel vertical migration (DVM), in which animals migrate to different depths of the water column in a daily cycle, have been reported in several species. In Paraeuchaeta norvegica, some populations exhibit strong DVM [13, 15], while others remain in deep waters throughout the day [16]. The vertical migratory behavior of carnivorous copepods is important as it can affect their diet, as well as the distribution of their prey and predators [7, 17]. Compared to the large amount data from temperate and polar regions, information on the ecology of Euchaetidae species in tropical and subtropical coastal seas is scarce, despite their abundance and wide distribution [18, 19].

Euchaetidae is one of the most abundant groups of large predatory copepods in the coastal waters of Hong Kong and southern China [2023]. In Hong Kong, four species of Euchaetidae, including Paraeuchaeta concinna (also known as Euchaeta concinna), Euchaeta indica, Paraeuchaeta plana (also known as Euchaeta plana), and Euchaeta rimana, have been reported, and their abundance is highest in oceanic waters in the east and southeast, where the influence of discharge from the Zhujiang River is low [20, 24].

Tolo Harbour and Mirs Bay are two semi-enclosed bays in the northeastern part of Hong Kong. Tolo Harbour, a landlocked bay with an average depth of ~ 12 m, is connected to Mirs Bay by a narrow channel. Mirs Bay, a much larger bay with an average depth of ~ 18 m, is directly exposed to currents and waves from the open sea areas in the east and southeastern part of Hong Kong. Tolo Harbour has a copepod community of higher density and lower diversity compared to Mirs Bay [25]. The copepod communities in both bays are dominated by small copepods of the genera Paracalanus and Oithona, while larger copepods such as Subeucalanus subcrassus and Calanus sinicus are common only in the deeper waters outside Tolo Harbour [25, 26]. Of the four species of Euchaetidae reported in Hong Kong, P. concinna is the most abundant [24]. This study aims to provide quantitative information on the seasonal distribution and feeding behavior of this predatory copepod in the coastal seas of eastern Hong Kong.


Seasonal distribution

Zooplankton samples were collected at intervals of two to three weeks at six fixed stations in the eastern part of Hong Kong over a two-year period from July 2003 to June 2005 (Figure 1). S1 (22°26'725"N, 114°14'566"E) and S2 (22°28'539"N, 114°18'034"E) were located inside Tolo Harbour. S3 (22°29'468"N, 114°21'588"E) was in the inner part of Mirs Bay, near the mouth of Tolo Harbour. S4 (22°26'670"N, 114°26'920"E) was located in Mirs Bay. S5 (22°17'560"N, 114°26'920"E) and S6 (22°13'000"N, 114°26'920"E) were located outside Mirs Bay in the southeastern part of Hong Kong. Water depth increased from ~20 m at S1 to ~30 m at S6. Duplicate zooplankton samples were collected at each station by making vertical hauls from 2 m above the bottom to the surface with a conical plankton net (0.5 m mouth diameter, 125 μm mesh size) and immediately preserved in 4% buffered formaldehyde solution. All samples were collected between 1000 and 1600 h to minimize diurnal variations in zooplankton abundance. Temperature and salinity were measured at the surface (0.5 m) of each station at the time of zooplankton sampling with a Hydrolab H20 water analysis system. In the laboratory, zooplankton samples were examined and enumerated under a stereomicroscope. P. concinna was identified according to Park [1].

Figure 1

Map of Hong Kong showing the sampling stations in Tolo Harbour (S1, S2), Mirs Bay (S3, S4) and southeastern Hong Kong waters (S5, S6).

Diel patterns in vertical distribution and gut fullness

The diel vertical distribution of P. concinna was studied at S5 (22°17'560"N, 114°26'920"E) on 6–7 January 2005 (Figure 1). Sunrise and sunset times were 0700 h and 1800 h, respectively. Duplicate zooplankton samples were taken from 0–5 m, 5–10 m, 10–15 m, 15–20 m and 20–25 m at 1200 h, 1600 h, 2000 h, 2400 h, 0400 h and 0800 h using a plankton net with a closing device (0.5 m mouth diameter, 125 μm mesh size). All samples were immediately preserved in 4% buffered formaldehyde solution. Vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and DO were measured at noon and midnight with a Hydrolab H20 water analysis system. Light intensity was measured at noon only with a light meter (LI-250 light meter, LI-193SA underwater quantum sensor) and was expressed as the light refractive index, which represents the ratio of light intensity in the water to light intensity just above the surface.

In the laboratory, P. concinna was identified according to Park [1] and densities of adults were estimated by counting entire samples. Male and female P. concinna were identified according to the morphological characteristic of their reproductive structures. Females with (ovigerous) and without egg sac (non-ovigerous) were counted separately. Zooplankton densities were estimated by counting at least 5% of each sample. At least 100 copepods from each sample were identified to the genus level according to the descriptions of Zheng and Zhang [19] to provide information on species compositions.

The entire digestive tracts of 10 randomly sorted P. concinna adult females were dissected under a stereomicroscope according to the method of Øresland [9]. The stomach content in the anterior part of each digestive tract was examined under a light microscope and prey items were identified as far as possible to the lowest taxon, using identifiable structures such as the mandibles. The gut fullness index was estimated as the ratio of the volume of stomach content to the total volume of the stomach.

Data analysis

To compare the vertical distribution of the predator and prey, the weighted mean depth (WMD) was calculated using the equation of Worthington [27]:

W M D = Σ D i d i / Σ D i

where d i is the depth from which sample i was collected, and D i is the density of P. concinna in sample i.

As Euchaetidae adult males, with their reduced mouthparts and intestines, do not feed [28, 29], investigation of the feeding behavior of P. concinna was limited to the adult females.

Prey selectivity was calculated using the electivity measure (α) of Chesson [30]. Electivity for prey item i i ) was calculated using the equation:

α i = r i / p i / Σ r i / p i

where r i and p i represent the proportion of prey item i in the gut of the predator and in the water column, respectively. The measure (α) was converted to an electivity index (ε) using the equation [31]:

ε i = m α i 1 / m α i 2 α i + 1

where m is the number of prey items and the value of ε ranges from −1 to +1. Positive values indicate selection for and negative values indicate selection against the prey item.

The feeding rate (I t ) of P. concinna females for sampling time interval t, which was a duration of 4 h, was estimated by the equation:

I t = 4 G t / k

where G t is the number of prey per female for P. concinna collected at time interval t and k is the digestion time in hours.

The daily predation impact (PI) of female P. concinna on a particular prey was then estimated using the equation:

P I = Σ I t N t / P t 100

where I t is the feeding rate of female P. concinna at time interval t. N t and P t represent the densities of female P. concinna and prey at time interval t, respectively.

Measurement of digestion time

Digestion time, or the time required by P. concinna females to digest natural copepod prey, was determined in the laboratory. Live copepods were collected by vertical hauls at S5 and immediately returned to the laboratory in surface seawater in 10-L plastic bottles. Adult females of P. concinna were sorted with wide-bore pipettes and maintained without food in 125 μm-filtered surface seawater at 20°C in large aquaria. After 24 h, females that still swam actively were transferred individually to 1-L fleakers. After an acclimation period of ~1 h, 30 small copepods were added to each fleaker as prey. Two groups of natural copepod prey, Paracalanus/Parvocalanus and Acrocalanus, were used. Feeding activities of P. concinna was observed directly with a magnifying lens. To facilitate the observation of prey ingestion, prey were stained with neutral red for ~30 min and washed with 125 μm filtered seawater before being fed to P. concinna. Females that ingested a prey were immediately transferred to fleakers without prey and remained under constant observation. Digestion time was recorded as the duration between prey capture and egestion of a colored fecal pellet by the predator. The digestion times for each group of prey were obtained by observing 10 females.

Statistical analysis

Two criteria were used to detect the occurrence of diel vertical migration (DVM) in P. concinna and other copepods. Day-night differences in the WMD and percentage of population at the upper-most layer were compared using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in both criteria indicated strong DVM, while a significant difference in only one criterion indicated weak DVM. No significant difference suggested that the animals did not exhibit DVM.

Gut fullness values were arcsine transformed and two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison was used to test for differences in the gut fullness of P. concinna females between day and night and among different depth layers.


Seasonal hydrography

Surface temperature was higher in summer (June to September) than in winter (December to March) (Figure 2). Surface salinity was affected by seasonal patterns in precipitation, and was lower in spring and summer (April to September) than in autumn and winter (October to March).

Figure 2

Seasonal variations in surface water temperature and salinity. Values are mean (± Standard deviation) of the six sampling stations.

Seasonal abundance and spatial distribution

The density of adult P. concinna was lowest at S1 in the inner part of Tolo Harbour and highest at S5 and S6 in the open seas of southeastern Hong Kong (Figure 3). Over the entire study period, average densities were < 0.1–0.4 ind.m-3 at S1, S2 and S3, and 1.0–1.2 ind.m-3 at S4, S5 and S6. P. concinna was common only during winter and spring, and the highest densities were recorded in December and January. Density > 5 ind.m-3 appeared only when water temperature was < 21°C (Figure 4).

Figure 3

Temporal variation in the mean density (± Standard deviation) of P. concinna in Tolo Harbour (S1 & S2) and Mirs Bay (S3 & S4) and southeastern Hong Kong waters (S5 & S6).

Figure 4

Relationship between the density of P. concinna and surface water temperature and salinity. Size of the circles represents the density range.

Diel vertical distribution

The diel pattern in the vertical distribution of P. concinna was studied at S5 on 6–7 January 2005. Averaged over the entire water column, the temperature was 17.6°C during the day and 17.3°C at night (Figure 5). The difference in temperature between surface and 20 m was slight, and the water column was well oxygenated. Light intensity was measured at noon. The ratio of light intensity in the water to light intensity above the surface revealed that light attenuated rapidly in the upper 5 m, and very little light reached depths below 15 m (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), and light intensity ratio (noon only) at noon and midnight during the diel behavior study at S5 on 6–7 January 2005. “Light intensity ratio” refers to the ratio of light intensity in the water to light intensity just above the surface.

Most adult females stayed at depths below 10 m at noon and 1600 h (Figure 6). Upward migration between 1600 h and 2000 h was confirmed by an increase in density at 0–5 m from < 1 ind.m-3 to ~ 10 ind.m-3. At midnight, the density at the upper-most layer was still ~ 10 ind.m-3, but most of the females had returned to depths below 15 m. At 0800 h in the morning, almost no females were found at depths above 10 m. The diel vertical distribution patterns displayed by both ovigerous and non-ovigerous females were similar to that observed in the entire female population. The vertical distribution of the males was also similar to that of the females. In conclusion, all P. concinna, including females (both ovigerous and non-ovigerous) and males, performed DVM, as both WMD and the percentage of the population at the surface showed significant differences between day and night (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Figure 6

Diel variations in the mean density (± Standard deviation) of female P. concinna at different layers of the water column. Grey shading represents nighttime.

Table 1 Average values of weighted mean depth (WMD) and the percentage of the population at the surface during day and night for female (total, ovigerous, and non-ovigerous) and male P. concinna , Acrocalanus , Paracalanus and Parvocalanus , and Canthocalanus copepodites

Feeding and predation impact

P. concinna females tended to have empty guts during the day (Figure 7). Females with high gut fullness index first appeared at 2000 h, and females with the highest gut fullness index were collected at midnight at 0–5 m. At 2000 h, females collected in the upper 15 m of the water column had much higher gut fullness than females collected from the bottom. Females with high gut fullness index appeared in the bottom layers at midnight and 0400 h. These observations suggested that P. concinna females fed at the surface layers and returned to deeper waters after feeding. Gut fullness decreased rapidly after midnight and returned to low levels at 0800 h. Results of two-way ANOVA showed that the gut fullness of female P. concinna differed significantly between day and night (p < 0.001), but did not vary among the depth layers (p > 0.05).

Figure 7

Diel variations in the gut fullness index (± Standard deviation) of female P. concinna at different layers of the water column. Grey shading represents nighttime. n = 10 for each data point.

Copepods, the major prey of female P. concinna, comprised ~ 40% of the gut contents (Figure 8). Eggs, remains of crustaceans and unidentified items made up the remaining gut contents. All copepods found in the gut were calanoid copepods. Acrocalanus constituted ~ 50% of all copepod prey. Other common copepod prey included Paracalanus/Parvocalanus (~ 30%) and copepodites of Canthocalanus (~ 11%). The electivity index (ε) showed that Acrocalanus (ε = 0.51) and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus (ε = 0.21) were the only prey items that were positively selected by female P. concinna.

Figure 8

Composition of copepods in the gut of female P. concinna and in the environment.

The mean digestion times of female P. concinna were 5.3 h for Paracalanus/Parvocalanus and 5.6 h for Acrocalanus. The estimated feeding rates of female P. concinna ranged from 0 to 0.30 prey predator-1h-1 on Acrocalanus and 0 to 0.38 prey predator-1h-1 on Paracalanus/Parvocalanus. Predation impact, expressed as the percentage of the standing stock removed daily by P. concinna, was 4.30% for Acrocalanus and 4.26% for Paracalanus/Parvocalanus.

Prey availability

Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus, the most ingested and only positively selected prey of P. concinna females, stayed nearer to the surface than P. concinna females during both day and night, as shown by their WMDs (Table 1). Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus did not exhibit DVM, as both WMD and percentage of the population at the surface did not differ significantly between day and night (p > 0.05). The WMDs of Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus differed significantly (p < 0.05) from that of P. concinna females only during the day. In contrast, the vertical distribution of Canthocalanus copepodites, which were not positively selected by P. concinna, overlapped with that of P. concinna. Their WMD appeared to be very similar to that of P. concinna females during both day and night (Table 1). Canthocalanus copepodites exhibited weak DVM, as significant diel difference was found only in the percentage of the population at the surface (p < 0.05), but not in WMD (p > 0.05).


P. concinnaseasonal and spatial distribution

P. concinna is the most abundant Euchaetidae in the study area, comprising more than 70% of the total Euchaetidae population (Wong unpublished data). It is one of the four species of Euchaetidae (P. concinna, E. rimana, P. plana and E. indica) recorded in Hong Kong’s coastal waters [20, 24, 32, 33]. Along the Chinese coast, P. concinna has been reported from the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea [18, 19, 34]. The species is considered to be limited to the Indo-Pacific in distribution [1].

Our results are in agreement with previous studies that dense populations of P. concinna appear only in winter and spring in Hong Kong [20, 22, 32, 33], when the water temperature is low (16–24°C). In comparison, Euchaetidae in the temperate oceans of the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea exhibits an opposite seasonal pattern. Both P. concinna and E. rimana are carried by the Kuroshio Current into the coastal areas of the East China Sea, and reach peak densities in summer and autumn [18]. P. concinna occurs throughout the year in the northern Taiwan coast which is influenced by the Kuroshio Current year-round [35], but their density is higher in autumn and winter when water masses from the East China Sea flow toward Taiwan [35].

The abundance and distribution of copepods are known to be influenced by hydrographic conditions [36, 37]. The density of P. concinna is lower in the semi-enclosed Tolo Harbour than the east and southeastern waters that are fully exposed to water currents from the South China Sea. The low densities at most times of the year, together with the pattern of shoreward decrease in density, suggest that P. concinna is transported into the coastal seas of eastern Hong Kong by water currents from the South China Sea, and the scarcity of P. concinna in the inner parts of Tolo Harbour can be explained by loss during physical transport.

On the other hand, trophic interactions may also influence the abundance of P. concinna in Tolo Harbour. The copepod community in Tolo Harbour is dominated by small copepods such as Parvocalanus crassirostris and Paracalanus parvus [26]. Such a plethora of small calanoid copepods suggests that carnivorous copepods such as P. concinna will not be limited by food [8, 9, 38, 39]. Chang et al. [40] proposed that the density of large copepods, such as P. concinna, is controlled directly by fishes, while the density of small copepods is controlled by invertebrate predators. Several observations suggest that fish predation may contribute to the scarcity of large copepods such as P. concinna in Tolo Harbour and other nearshore areas of Mirs Bay. First, dense populations of the planktivorous Ambassis (glassfish) occur in Tolo Harbour throughout the year [41]. Secondly, copepods are known to be the major prey of larval and juvenile fishes which appear in large numbers in Tolo Harbour during late winter and early spring [42].

Diel behaviors

Both male and female P. concinna exhibit DVM. The congener Paraeuchaeta norvegica has been observed to perform DVM over depths of hundreds of meters [4345], but there are also reports of non-migrating populations of this species [12, 16]. The vertical distribution of P. norvegica [14] and Paraeuchaeta elongata [10, 46] has been shown to be affected by ovigerity. The reproducing females of the calanoid copepod Eurytemora hirundoides have also been found to occupy deeper waters in the Archipelago Sea [47]. Ovigerous Eurytemora are highly selected by the planktivorous Baltic herring [48], and Vuorinen [49] has proposed that visual predation is the most probable cause of the difference in vertical distribution between ovigerous and non-ovigerous females. However, the results of this study show that both ovigerous and non-ovigerous females of P. concinna perform DVM.

DVM in crustacean zooplankton is widely considered to be an antipredator behavior [15, 45, 5053]. Small pelagic organisms have no means to hide from visual predators, such as fish, in well-lit surface waters during the daytime, and must minimize predation risk by seeking refuge in deeper depths that have less light penetration [54]. Light is, therefore, commonly considered as a proximal cause or signal for zooplankton DVM [55, 56]. Light intensity drops dramatically in the first 5 m, and very little light penetrates into waters below 15 m. The WMD of P. concinna is below 15 m during daytime. This suggests that P. concinna adjusts its vertical distribution to achieve an optimal balance between the energy cost of DVM and the benefit of reducing visual predation risks. Vuorinen [49] suggested that it may be a viable strategy for copepods to stay in deeper waters at all times if the temperature and food supply do not vary greatly between the deep and surface layers. While there was little temperature change with depth in the well-mixed, shallow waters of eastern Hong Kong, more than 50% of the Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus populations remained in the upper 0–5 m during both day and night, so the need for food may force P. concinna females to ascend to the surface at night. On the other hand, while adult male P. concinna do not feed, they still perform DVM and migrate to the surface at night. Such DVM behavior may therefore be an intrinsic behavior not driven by the need to feed, but other factors such as light. It is also possible that the P. concinna males follow the migrating females to increase the chance of mating, as male copepods of various species, e.g. Temora longicornis, Centropages typicus, Pseudocalanus elongatus, and Acartia tonsa, have been found to track and pursue female copepods through pheromones or hydromechanical signals for mating [5759].

Diel patterns in gut fullness suggests that female P. concinna only feed actively at night. Diel feeding rhythms have been reported in Paraeuchaeta in both laboratory [39] and field studies [13, 16]. Marked increase in the gut fullness of female P. concinna appears to coincide with their nocturnal ascent in the early part of the night, so the prevalence of individuals with relatively empty guts during the day may be due to a lack of access to prey. On the other hand, diel variations in gut fullness may not be associated with DVM. Female P. concinna stay in significantly deeper waters than Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus during the day, but appear to share the same depths with Canthocalanus copepodites during both day and night. The absence of Canthocalanus in the guts of female P. concinna in daytime therefore suggests that the predators feed only at night, and implies that the diel variations in gut fullness was not the result of the predators migrating into and out of the prey-rich surface layer. Other studies have found that copepods exhibit diel variations in the gut contents regardless of whether they perform DVM. The gut fluorescence of both surface dwelling and migrating zooplankton in the Bedford Basin reaches peak values only at night [60]. Diel feeding rhythm in two species of Calanus in the Bering Sea is also independent of DVM [61], and though Calanus pacificus in Dabob Bay performs DVM and enters into the surface layer 2.5 h before sunset, its gut pigment content only increases substantially after sunset [62].

Diel feeding rhythm in zooplankton is often regarded as a strategy to avoid the accumulation of pigments in daytime [62, 63], the purpose of which is to reduce the risk of attack by visual predators. Laboratory and field experiments with the rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri have confirmed that visual predators select the most pigmented calanoid copepods as prey [64]. Bollens and Stearns [65] reported that the gut fullness of Acartia hudsonica is lower in the presence than in the absence of fish. A. hudsonica and Acartia tonsa reduce their gut fullness in the presence of fish exudates, and the response is observed only when the light level is sufficient for visual predation [66]. These results suggest that P. concinna females may stop feeding during the day to reduce the chances of being attacked by fishes.

Prey composition and selectivity

Small calanoid copepods constitute ~40% of the prey in the guts of female P. concinna. The estimate is considered to be conservative as some unidentified items found in the guts may also be the remains of calanoid copepods. The importance of calanoid copepods as food for female P. concinna is in accordance with previous findings on the natural diets of Paraeuchaeta species [9, 38]. Copepods including Metridia gerlachei, Calanoides acutus, Euchaeta spp., Oncaea spp., and Oithona spp. made up 80–90% of the prey consumed by adults and copepodites (C5) of Paraeuchaeta antarctica in Antarctic waters [9]. Øresland and Ward [38] also reported that copepods form 46–99% of the diets of P. antarctica, Paraeuchaeta farrani, Paraeuchaeta rasa, and Paraeuchaeta biloba in South Georgia.

P. concinna females feed on a variety of small calanoid copepods including Canthocalanus, Centropages, and Subeucalanus, but show strong preference for Acrocalanus, Parvocalanus, and Paracalanus. In laboratory feeding experiments, Yen [67] found that prey size is an important factor in the dietary selectivity of P. norvegica. The prosome length of preferred copepod prey is usually ~70% the length of the second basipodal segment of the maxilliped of the predator. A similar proportion of 65% was found for P. antarctica, which exhibits the highest feeding rates on copepods with prosome length of 1.2 mm [8]. In this study, the prosome length of Acrocalanus (~0.6–0.7 mm) is about 65–75% the length of the second basipodal segment of the maxilliped (~0.92 mm) of P. concinna females, agreeing with the optimal prey size proposed by Yen [44]. On the other hand, the prosome lengths of Paracalanus and Parvocalanus (~0.3–0.4 mm) are only 33–40% the length of the second basipodal segment of the maxilliped of P. concinna. These smaller copepods may therefore be more suitable prey for the smaller late copepodite stages of P. concinna (C4 and C5). The prosome length of the negatively selected Canthocalanus copepodites (~0.8–1.0 mm) is ~85% the length of the second basipodal segment of the predator maxilliped.

P. concinna females in this study did not feed on cyclopoid copepods, even though small cyclopoid copepods including Oithona and Oncaea were common in the gut of P. antarctica and may be the major prey of this predatory copepod, especially the copepodite stages [9, 38, 68]. Yen [67] reported that the cyclopoid copepods Oithona and Corycaeus are not preferred prey of P. antarctica, and proposed that the intermittent and darting movement of cyclopoid copepods are not easily detected by tactile predators. The copepod community in Mirs Bay is dominated by calanoid copepods (> 80% of the total copepod population), and Oithona and Oncaea species only comprise ~ 7% and 5% respectively of the total copepod populations [25]. The reason for the absence of cyclopoid copepods in the gut of female P. concinna may be a combination of the prey’s low abundance, small size (prosome length ~0.2–0.3 mm), and less detectable swimming behavior.

Digestion time and feeding rate

Tönnesson et al. [6] found a gut evacuation rate of 0.080 h-1 or digestion time of 12 h at 15°C for P. norvegica. This is much longer than the digestion time of ~ 5 h recorded at 18°C for P. concinna in this study. The relationship between the predator size and digestion time in copepods is unclear, although some studies have found no relationship between digestion time and predator size [69, 70]. A common conclusion from previous studies is that digestion time varies with temperature [7175] and prey size [76]. The higher water temperature in the subtropical seas of Hong Kong may allow shorter digestion times for female P. concinna, but it can also be argued that Paracalanus and Pseudocalanus, the copepod prey used to estimate the digestion time of P. norvegica [6], are bigger than Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus, the natural prey of P. concinna. On the contrary, Yen [77] reported a considerably higher gut evacuation rate of 0.43 h-1 and correspondingly very short digestion time of ~ 2 h for P. norvegica feeding on cod larvae at 7.5°C. As fish larvae lack the chitinous exoskeleton of copepod prey, they may be more easily digestible.

While the daily feeding rate of copepods changes with temperature and prey availability [35, 7173], our estimated daily feeding rates for female P. concinna feeding on Acrocalanus (~4.7 prey predator-1d-1) and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus (~4.4 prey predator-1d-1) are within the range of values reported for P. norvegica. Olsen et al. [78] reported a feeding rate of 3.6 prey predator-1d-1 at 7–10°C in the laboratory. Tönnesson et al. [6] reported in situ feeding rates of 1.4–5.2 prey predator-1d-1 at 5°C and 6.2–8.6 prey predator-1d-1 at 15°C.

Predation impact

P. concinna females remove ~ 4.3% of both the Acrocalanus and Paracalanus/Parvocalanus standing stock daily in the coastal sea of eastern Hong Kong. The estimates were conservative as only predation by adult females was considered. Øresland [9] found that the feeding rates of copepodites are higher than that of adults in Antarctic waters. The predation impact by the entire P. concinna population may therefore be higher as Paracalanus and Parvocalanus are small enough to be eaten by late copepodite stages, which are frequently more abundant than adults (Wong unpublished data). Predation impact estimated for female P. concinna in this study is within the range of values reported for other predatory copepods. Tönnesson et al. [6] reported a predation impact of 2.0–6.5% on small copepods by P. norvegica in the Skagerrak. The predation impact of Tortanus spp. on small copepod populations ranged from 1% in San Franscisco Estuary [79], to 2.7% in Fukuyama Harbour [80].

Copepods are also the major prey of chaetognaths. While the predation impact of chaetognaths on copepods can reach 6% in Northern Chile [81] and 7.8% in the eastern Mediterranean [82], a recent study conducted in Tolo Harbour and Mirs Bay showed that the predation impact of chaetognath on the copepod population is < 1% [83]. This finding suggests that P. concinna may play a more important role than other invertebrate predators in regulating the populations of small calanoid copepods in the eastern waters of Hong Kong, especially during winter and spring.


P. concinna is common in the coastal waters of eastern Hong Kong only during winter and spring. A trend of shoreward decrease in abundance suggests that the population in the shallow areas of eastern Hong Kong is derived from populations in offshore areas in the South China Sea. The entire adult population of P. concinna remains in dark, deeper waters during the day, probably to minimize the risks of fish predation. At night, P. concinna migrate to the surface, where their preferred prey, Acrocalanus, Paracalanus, and Parvocalanus stay throughout the day. P. concinna females with full guts are most common at night, but the diel feeding rhythm is probably not related to DVM. P. concinna removes ~4.3% of the Acrocalanus, Paracalanus, and Parvocalanus standing stock daily, making it an important predator of small calanoid copepods.



Diel vertical migration


Weighted mean depth.


  1. 1.

    Park T: Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography vol 29. Taxonomy and distribution of the marine calanoid copepod family Euchaetidae. 1995, San Diego: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Båmstedt U, Skjoldal HR: Studies on the deep-water pelagic community of Korsfjorden, western Norway. Adenosine phosphates and nucleic acids in Euchaeta norvegica (Copepoda) in relation to its life cycle. Sarsia. 1976, 60: 63-80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bakke LW: Ecological studies on the deep-water pelagic community of Korsfjorden, western Norway. Population dynamics of Euchaeta norvegica (Crustacea, Copepoda) from 1971 to 1974. Sarsia. 1977, 63: 49-55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bathmann UV, Noji TT, von Bodungen B: Copepod grazing potential in late winter in the Norwegian Sea – a factor in the control of spring phytoplankton growth?. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1990, 60: 225-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eiane K, Aksnes DL, Ohman MD, Wood S, Martinussen MB: Stage-specific mortality of Calanus spp. under different predation regimes. Limnol Oceanogr. 2002, 47: 636-645. 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tönnesson K, Nielsen TG, Tiselius P: Feeding and production of the carnivorous copepod Paraeuchaeta norvegica in the Skagerrak. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006, 314: 213-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ohman MD, Frost BW, Cohen EB: Reverse diel vertical migration: an escape from invertebrate predators. Science. 1983, 220: 1404-1407. 10.1126/science.220.4604.1404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yen J: Predatory feeding behaviour of an Antarctic marine copepod, Euchaeta antarctica. Polar Res. 1991, 10: 433-442. 10.1111/j.1751-8369.1991.tb00664.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Øresland V: Feeding of the carnivorous copepod Euchaeta antarctica in Antarctic waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991, 78: 41-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mauchline J: Bathymetric adaptations of life history patterns of congeneric species (Euchaeta: Calanoida) in a 2000 m water column. J Mar Sci. 1995, 52: 511-516.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Alonzo F, Mayzaud P, Razouls S: Egg production, population structure and biochemical composition of the subantarctic copepod Paraeuchaeta antarctica in the Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2000, 205: 207-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fleddum A, Kaartvedt S, Ellertsen B: Distribution and feeding of the carnivorous copepod Paraeuchaeta norvegica in habitats of shallow prey assemblages and midnight sun. Mar Biol. 2001, 139: 719-726. 10.1007/s002270100618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Skarra H, Kaartvedt S: Vertical distribution and feeding of the carnivorous copepod Paraeuchaeta norvegica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003, 249: 215-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vestheim H, Kaartvedt S, Edvardsen B: State-dependent vertical distribution of the carnivore copepod Paraeuchaeta norvegica. J Plankton Res. 2005, 27: 19-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bollens SM, Frost BW: Zooplanktivorous fish and variable diel vertical migration in the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol Oceanogr. 1989, 34: 1073-1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kaartvedt S, Dale T, Bagøien E, Viken T: Bi-model vertical distribution of the carnivorous copepod Paraeuchaeta norvegica. J Plankton Res. 2002, 24: 155-158. 10.1093/plankt/24.2.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hays GC: A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations. Hydrobiologia. 2003, 503: 163-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen QC, Zhang SZ: On planktonic copepods of the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. I. Calanoida. Stud Mar Sin. 1965, 7: 20-131. In Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zheng Z, Zhang SZ: Marine pelagic copepods of China. 1985, Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen QC: The marine zooplankton in Hong Kong. The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and southern China. Edited by: Morton B, Tseng CK. 1982, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 789-799.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hwang JS, Chen QC, Wong CK: Taxonomic composition, density and biomass of free-living copepods in the coastal waters of southwestern Taiwan. Crustaceana. 2003, 76: 193-206. 10.1163/156854003321824549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lee CNW, Chen QC: A historical and biogeographical analysis of the marine planktonic copepod community in Hong Kong: a record of change. Perspectives on marine environment change in Hong Kong and southern China, 1977–2001. Edited by: Morton B. 2003, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 433-457.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yang CL, Chang TS, Ming AL, Hung ZS: Spring distribution of copepods in relation to water masses in the northern Taiwan Strait. Zool Stud. 2004, 43: 332-342.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee CNW: Seasonal changes in the planktonic copepod community of the southeastern coastal waters of Hong Kong. Perspectives on marine environment change in Hong Kong and southern China, 1977–2001. Edited by: Morton B. 2003, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 367-387.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang G, Wong CK: Changes in the planktonic copepod community in a landlocked bay in the subtropical coastal waters of Hong Kong during recovery from eutrophication. Hydrobiologia. 2011, 666: 277-288. 10.1007/s10750-010-0422-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wong CK, Chan ALC, Chen QC: Planktonic copepods of Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong. Crustaceana. 1993, 64: 76-84. 10.1163/156854093X00081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Worthington EB: Vertical movements of freshwater macroplankton. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol. 1931, 25: 394-436. 10.1002/iroh.19310250510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee S: Preliminary studies on the food and feeding habits of some marine planktonic copepods in Amoy waters. J Xiamen Univ. 1964, 11: 93-109. In Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yen J: Directionality and swimming speeds in predator–prey and male–female interactions of Euchaeta rimana, a subtropical marine copepod. Bull Mar Sci. 1988, 43: 395-403.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chesson J: Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology. 1978, 59: 211-215. 10.2307/1936364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chesson J: The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology. 1983, 64: 1297-1304. 10.2307/1937838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chen QC, Wong CK, Tam PF, Lee CNW, Yin JQ, Huang LM, Tam YH: Variations in the abundance and structure of the planktonic copepod community in the Pearl River Estuary, China. Perspectives on marine environment change in Hong Kong and southern China, 1977–2001. Edited by: Morton B. 2003, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 389-400.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chan ALC: PhD Thesis. The ecology of marine plankton in Tai Tam Bay, Hong Kong with special reference to barnacle (Arthropoda: Cirripedia) larvae. 1995, Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, Zoology Department

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen QC, Shen CJ: The pelagic copepods of the South China Sea II. Stud Mar Sin. 1974, 9: 125-137.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang GM, He DH, Wang CS, Miao YT, Yu HH: Study on the biological oceanographic characteristics of planktonic copepods in the waters north of Taiwan, China. I. Abundance distribution. Acta Oceanol Sin. 1999, 21: 78-86. In Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Boucher M, Ibanez F, Prieru L: Daily and seasonal variation in the spatial distribution of zooplankton populations in relation to the physical structure in the Ligurian Sea Front. J Mar Res. 1987, 45: 133-173. 10.1357/002224087788400891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shih CT, Chiu TS: Copepod diversity in the water masses of the southern East China Sea north of Taiwan. J Mar Syst. 1998, 15: 533-542. 10.1016/S0924-7963(97)00053-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Øresland V, Ward P: Summer and winter diet of four carnivorous copepod species around South Georgia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1993, 98: 73-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yen J: Sources of variability in attack rates of Euchaeta elongata Esterly, a carnivorous marine copepod. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1982, 63: 105-117. 10.1016/0022-0981(82)90025-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chang KH, Nagata T, Hanazato T: Direct and indirect impacts of predation by fish on the zooplankton community: an experimental analysis using tanks. Limnology. 2004, 5: 121-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wong CK, Li VCY, Chan A: Diel cycles of reproduction and vertical migration in the marine cladocerans Pseudevadne tergestina and Penilia avirostris. J Plankton Res. 2008, 30: 65-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nip HM, Ho WY, Wong CK: Feeding ecology of larval and juvenile black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegeli) and Japanese seaperch (Lateolabrax japonicus) in Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong. Environ Biol Fish. 2003, 66: 197-209. 10.1023/A:1023611207492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Longhurst AR, Williams R: Materials for plankton modeling: Vertical distribution of Atlantic zooplankton in summer. J Plankton Res. 1979, 1: 1-28. 10.1093/plankt/1.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yen J: Vertical distribution and migratory activity of 3 species of Euchaeta, a carnivorous marine copepod. Bull Mar Sci. 1985, 37: 781-782.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mauchline J: Restriction of body size spectra within species of deep-sea plankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992, 90: 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bollens SM, Frost BW: Diel vertical migration in zooplankton: rapid individual response to predators. J Plankton Res. 1991, 13: 1359-1365. 10.1093/plankt/13.6.1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Vuorinen I, Rajasilta M, Salo J: Selective predation and habitat shift in a copepod species – support for the predation hypothesis. Oecologia. 1983, 59: 62-64. 10.1007/BF00388073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sandström O: Selective feeding by Baltic herring. Hydrobiologia. 1980, 69: 199-207. 10.1007/BF00046793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vuorinen I: Vertical migration of Eurytemora (Crustacea, Copepoda): a compromise between the risks of predation and decreased fecundity. J Plankton Res. 1987, 9: 1037-1046. 10.1093/plankt/9.6.1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zaret TM, Suffern JS: Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol Oceanogr. 1976, 21: 804-813. 10.4319/lo.1976.21.6.0804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bollens SM, Frost BW: Ovigerity, selective predation, and variable diel vertical migration in Euchaeta elongata (Copepoda: Calanoida). Oecologia. 1991, 87: 155-161. 10.1007/BF00325252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bollens SM, Frost BW, Thoreson DS, Watts SJ: Diel vertical migration in zooplankton: field evidence in support of the predator avoidance hypothesis. Hydrobiologia. 1992, 234: 33-39. 10.1007/BF00010777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    De Robertis A, Jaffe JS, Ohman MD: Size-dependent visual predation risk and the timing of vertical migration in zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr. 2000, 45: 1838-1844. 10.4319/lo.2000.45.8.1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lampert W: The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Funct Ecol. 1989, 3: 21-27. 10.2307/2389671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Andersen V, Nival P: A model of the diel vertical migration of zooplankton based on euphausiids. J Plankton Res. 1991, 49: 153-175.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Pearre S: Eat and run? The hunger/satiation hypothesis in vertical migration: history, evidence and consequences. Biol Rev. 2003, 78: 1-79. 10.1017/S146479310200595X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Doall MH, Colin SP, Strickler JR, Yen J: Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1998, 353: 681-689. 10.1098/rstb.1998.0234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yen J, Weissburg MJ, Doall MH: The fluid physics of signal perception by mate-tracking copepods. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1998, 353: 787-804. 10.1098/rstb.1998.0243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kiørboe T, Bagøien E: Motility patterns and mate encounter rates in planktonic copepods. Limnol Oceanogr. 2005, 50: 1999-2007. 10.4319/lo.2005.50.6.1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mackas D, Bohrer R: Fluorescence analysis of zooplankton gut contents and an investigation of diel feeding patterns. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1976, 25: 77-85. 10.1016/0022-0981(76)90077-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ishii H: In situ feeding rhythms of herbivorous copepods, and the effect of starvation. Mar Biol. 1990, 105: 91-98. 10.1007/BF01344274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Dagg MJ, Frost BW, Walser WE: Copepod diel migration, feeding and vertical flux of phaeopigments. Limnol Oceanogr. 1989, 34: 1062-1071. 10.4319/lo.1989.34.6.1062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kleppel GS, Willibanks L, Pieper RE: Diel variation in body carotenoid content and feeding activity in marine zooplankton assemblages. J Plankton Res. 1985, 7: 569-580. 10.1093/plankt/7.4.569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Byron ER: The adaptive significance of calanoid copepod pigmentation: A comparative and experimental analysis. Ecology. 1982, 63: 1871-1886. 10.2307/1940127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bollens SM, Stearns DE: Predator-induced changes in the diel feeding cycle of a planktonic copepod. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1992, 156: 179-186. 10.1016/0022-0981(92)90244-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cieri WD, Stearns DE: Reduction of grazing activity of two estuarine copepods in response to the exudates of a visual predator. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999, 177: 157-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yen J: Selective predation by the carnivorous marine copepodEuchaeta elongata: laboratory measurements of predation rate verified by field observations of temporal and spatial feeding patterns. Limnol Oceanogr. 1985, 30: 577-597. 10.4319/lo.1985.30.3.0577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hopkins TL: Food web of an Antarctic midwater ecosystem. Mar Biol. 1985, 89: 197-212. 10.1007/BF00392890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Szyper JP: Feeding rate of the chaetognath Sagitta enflata in nature. Estuar Coast Mar Sci. 1978, 7: 567-575. 10.1016/0302-3524(78)90065-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sullivan BK: In situ feeding behaviour of Sagitta elegans and Eukrohnia hamata (Chaetognatha) in relation to the vertical distribution and abundance of prey at ocean station ‘P’. Limnol Oceanogr. 1980, 25: 317-326. 10.4319/lo.1980.25.2.0317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kiørboe T, Mohlenbery F, Nicolajsen H: Ingestion rate and gut clearance in the planktonic copepod Centropages hamatus (Lilljeborg) in relation to food concentration and temperature. Ophelia. 1982, 21: 181-194. 10.1080/00785326.1982.10426586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Dam HG, Peterson WT: The effect of temperature on the gut clearance rate constant of planktonic copepods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1988, 123: 1-14. 10.1016/0022-0981(88)90105-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wlodarczyk E, Durbin AG, Durbin EG: Effect of temperature on lower feeding thresholds, gut evacuation rate, and diel feeding behaviour in the copepod Acartia hudsonica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992, 85: 93-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Uye S, Yamamoto F: In situ feeding of the planktonic copepod Calanus sinicus in the Inland Sea of Japan, examined by the gut fluorescence method. Bull Plankton Soc Japan. 1995, 42: 123-139.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Li C, Sun S, Wang R, Wang X: Feeding and respiration rates of a planktonic copepod (Calanus sinicus) oversummering in Yellow Sea cold bottom waters. Mar Biol. 2004, 145: 149-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U: Digestion rate in relation to temperature of two gelatinous planktonic predators. Sarsia. 2001, 86: 21-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yen J: Predation by Euchaeta norvegica Boeck on eggs and larvae of the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1987, 112: 283-296. 10.1016/0022-0981(87)90074-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Olsen EM, Jørstad T, Kaartvedt S: The feeding strategies of two large marine copepods. J Plankton Res. 2000, 22: 1513-1528. 10.1093/plankt/22.8.1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hooff RC, Bollens SM: Functional response and potential predatory impact of Tortanus dextrilobatus, a carnivorous copepod recently introduced to the San Francisco Estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004, 277: 167-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Uye S, Kayano Y: Predatory feeding behaviour of Tortanus (Copepoda: Calanoida): life-stage differences and the predation impact on small planktonic crustaceans. J Crustacean Biol. 1994, 14: 473-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Giesecke R, González HE: Feeding of Sagitta enflata and vertical distribution of chaetognaths in relation to low oxygen concentrations. J Plankton Res. 2004, 26: 475-486. 10.1093/plankt/fbh039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kehayias G: Quantitative aspects of feeding of chaetognaths in the eastern Mediterranean pelagic waters. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2003, 83: 559-569. 10.1017/S0025315403007483h.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lie AAY, Tse P, Wong CK: Diel vertical migration, feeding, and coexistence of three species of chaetognaths (Flaccisagitta enflata, Aidanosagitta delicata, and Aidanosagitta neglecta) in a shallow subtropical bay. J Plankton Res. 2012, 34: 670-684. 10.1093/plankt/fbs041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Mr. Y.H. Yung, Mr. P. Tse, Mr. Y.K. Kwok, and Ms. V.C.Y. Li for assisting in acquisition of the samples, and Mr. K.C. Cheung for providing technical assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Kim Wong.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CKW was the Principal Investigator responsible for conceiving, coordinating, obtaining the funding to carry out the study, and modified the final draft of the manuscript. EYWY carried out the experimental work, prepared and analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AAYL analyzed and interpreted the data and results, and finalized the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, C.K., Yau, E.Y.W. & Lie, A.A.Y. The seasonal distribution, diel vertical distribution and feeding behavior of Paraeuchaeta concinna in the shallow subtropical coastal waters of eastern Hong Kong. Aquat. Biosyst. 8, 28 (2012).

Download citation


  • Paraeuchaeta concinna
  • Seasonal distribution
  • Diel vertical migration
  • Feeding