Open Access

Morphological study of Cyclotella choctawhatcheeanaPrasad (Stephanodiscaceae) from a saline Mexican lake

  • Maria Guadalupe Oliva1Email author,
  • Alfonso Lugo2,
  • Javier Alcocer2 and
  • Enrique A Cantoral-Uriza3
Saline Systems20084:17

DOI: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-17

Received: 12 March 2008

Accepted: 08 December 2008

Published: 08 December 2008

Abstract

Background

Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana Prasad 1990 is a small centric diatom found in the plankton of water bodies with a wide range of salt concentrations. This paper describes the morphological features of the valve of C. choctawhatcheeana, from Alchichica lake, a hyposaline lake located in Central Mexico, and provides information about their ecology with respect to water chemistry and distribution in the water column along the annual cycle. Alchichica, and their neighbor lake Atexcac, are the only Mexican water bodies where C. choctawhatcheeana has been registered.

Results

Morphological differences were found with respect to the original description. The valves of C. choctawhatcheeana from Alchichica exceeded the diameter (5–12 μm) given for the type material (3.0–9.5 μm), and it does not forms or seldom forms short chains (2–3 cells) in contrast of up to 20 cell chains. Other difference was the presence of irregularly distributed small silica granules around the margin of the external view of the valve, meanwhile in Prasad's diagnosis a ring of siliceous granules is present near the valve margin; all other features were within the range of variation of the species. Maximum densities (up to 3877 cells ml-1) of C. choctawhatcheeana were found in Alchichica lake from June to October, along the stratificated period of the lake. Low densities (48 cells ml-1) when the water column was mixed, in January and February. C. choctawhatcheeana of Lake Alchichica was found in an ample depth range from 20 m down to 50 m. Conductivity (K25) ranged between 13.3 and 14.5 mS cm-1 and the pH between 8.8 and 10.0. Water temperature fluctuated between 14.5 and 20°C. Dissolved oxygen ranged from anoxic (non detectable) up to saturation (7 mg l-1).

Conclusion

The morphology of C. choctawhatcheeana from Alchichica corresponded to the original description, with exception of some secondary traits. C. choctawhatcheeana can grow in several different environmental conditions. It can use nutrients along the water column during the mixing period in the lake. But when nutrients are scarce, C. choctawhatcheeana, can be located in very high densities, into a well defined depth layer of the lake, being an important contributor to the depth chlorophyll maximum (DCM). The species seems to be a small size but significant component of the phytoplankton in the saline Mexican lake Alchichica.

Background

Species belonging to genus Cyclotella (Küetzing) Brébisson occur over a wide range of environmental conditions, primarily although freshwater organisms and only eight species (C. caspia, C. choctawhatcheeana, C. cryptica, C. quillensis, C. litoralis, C. meneghiniana, C. striata and C. stylorum) have been found to inhabit saline waters [1]. In recent years the centric diatoms of saline lakes and estuaries have began to receive greater attention, particularly the genus Cyclotella [2, 3]. The taxonomy of Cyclotella is hard to unravel because of the considerable morphological variation among species [4, 5]. Diatoms typically form a significant fraction of the biota in saline lakes [6]. In Lake Alchichica, Puebla Mexico, the diatom assemblage included 10 species out of a total of 19 algae species [7].

One of them is the centric diatom C. choctawhatcheeana. This species has been previously reported from other inland saline waters [1, 812]. So far it covers from Canada (52°19'N) down to Argentina (35°15'S), it also has been found in Africa (20° 30' N), but it was never described from Mexico before (19° 24' N). Information on the presence of C. choctawhatcheeana in low latitude saline waters is scarce, maybe due to tropical inland saline lakes have been less investigated than those in temperate regions. The species is poorly known from Mexico and it has been cited only from two Mexican saline lakes [7, 13, 14], but the morphological description have not been presented.

This paper provides the detailed morphological features of the valve of C. choctawhatcheeana inhabiting the saline waters from crater Lake Alchichica. The detailed (light and scanning electron microscopy) morphological features of the valve and new information about its environmental conditions, abundance and distribution in the water column are provided.

Methods

Study area

Alchichica is a deep (maximum depth 62 m) crater lake located in the state of Puebla (19° 24' N and 97° 24' W), Central Mexico (Figure 1). The lake is warm monomictic [15]. Mixing takes place from the end of December or beginning of January until the onset of the stratification period by the end of April or beginning of May. A well-developed thermocline is present from June-July up to October-November. After November, the thermocline becomes deeper and weaker until its breakup in late December or early January.
Figure 1

Location of Lake Alchichica. Lower: Photograph of Lake Alchichica.

Alchichica is a unique Mexican hyposaline (8.3–9 g l-1; Na-Mg and Cl-HCO3) and alkaline (pH = 8.8–10.0) aquatic system characterized by endemic biota and distinctive features such a tufa towers ring. Among the endemic biota there have been described the atherinid fish Poblana alchichica [16], the ambystomatid salamander Ambystoma taylorii [17], the isopod Caecidotea williamsi [18], and more recently the centric diatom Cyclotella alchichicana [19].

Sampling and processing of the samples

Sampling took place at mid-day monthly at the central and deepest part of the lake during 2001. In situ profiles of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and conductivity (K25) were obtained with a calibrated Hydrolab® DS3/SVR3 multiparameter water-quality data logger and logging system (discrete readings every meter). Ten water samples (depth 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 and 60 m deep) for phytoplankton analysis were obtained with a 6-liter Niskin-type water sampler. Two 500 ml sub-samples from each sampling depth were fixed, one with 4% formaldehyde and the other with Lugol's solution (1%). Phytoplankton were counted in 50 ml settling chamber with a Zeiss inverted microscope D following the Utermöhl method [20, 21]. Valves of C. choctawhatcheeana were counted at a magnification of 806×. Additional material was cleaned through acid oxidation. Aliquots were dried onto cover slips and mounted in Naphrax [22]. Slides were examined by phase-contrast microscopy. Microphotographs were taken with a Nikon Lobophot-2 photomicroscope. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cover slips with the dried material were mounted on aluminum stubs and coated with pure silver. We used a JEOL JSM-5200 microscope (working distance 10 mm, accelerating voltage 25 kV). For the description of the valve morphology we followed the terminology in [3, 23, 24].

Morphological traits included for comparison were valve diameter, number and arrangement of the marginal and central fultoportulae (strutted processes), presence of the marginal rimoportula (labiate process), presence of marginal spines, presence of granules, density of striae, and the structure of the central area of the valves.

Results

Description of C. choctawhatcheeanaof the Lake Alchichica

Frustules drum-shaped in girdle view, seldom forming short chains (i.e. 2–3 cells). In LM the specimens showed an indistinct structure. Valves are circular, 5–12 μm (mean 8.6 μm, N = 100) in diameter (Figure 2a). In the SEM, the external view of the valve shows marginal striae of equal length, radiating from the center of the valve, and extending to the mantle edge; striae 12–14 in 5 μm (Figure 2b, d). The striae start at the transition of the central to marginal area with two rows of areolae becoming three towards the valve face/mantle junction (Figure 2d–e). The central area is colliculate [3, 8] showing a conspicuous tangential undulation and the openings of the central fultoportulae (Figure 2b, d). Small silica granules around the margin irregularly distributed were presented (Figure 2c, f). No spines on the marginal area of the valve were observed. Externally the rimoportula is visible on one of the interstria as a slit-like opening (Figure 2c). The internal view of the valve shows 7–14 marginal fultoportulae per valve, on every second, third or fourth costa, each having two satellite pores (Figure 3a–c). These fultoportulae open to the exterior as circular openings on every second, third or fourth interstria (Figure 2c, e). The single marginal rimoportula is placed on one costa radially oriented between the fultoportulae (Figure 3a–b). Central area is smooth, usually with two central fultoportulae, occasionally four. Each fultoportula is surrounded by three satellite pores (Figure 3a, d). We found some girdle views in which we observed the ligular area and open band (Figure 2f), and they were similar to those showed in [1].
Figure 2

Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana . Lake Alchichica. (a) External valve view. Ligh microscopy. Scale bar = 5 μm (b) External view with colliculate central area. SEM. Scale bar = 1 μm (c) External view of the valve margin showing the openings of the rimoportula (rp), marginal fultoportulae (fp) and silica granules. SEM. Scale bar = 1 μm (d) Detail of the colliculate central area with the openings of the fultoportulae (fp) SEM. Scale bar = 1 (e) External view with marginal fultoportulae (fp) and three rows of areolae. SEM. Scale bar = 0.5 μm (f) Girdle view showing the ligular area. SEM. Scale bars = 0.5 μm

Figure 3

Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana. Lake Alchichica. (a) Whole valve, internal view showing central and marginal fultoportulae (cfp, mfp) and the rimoportula (arrowed) SEM Scale bar = 1 μm (b) Internal view of marginal area showing the fultoportulae (fp) every second or third costa and the rimoportula (rp). SEM. Scale bar = 1 μm (c) Detail of the internal view of the marginal fultoportulae with two satellite pores and a single rimoportula between the fultoportulae. SEM. Scale bar = 0.5 μm (d) Detail of the central area with four fultoportulae showing three satellite pores each. SEM Scale bar = 0.5 μm

Geographic distribution

Distribution of C. choctawhatcheeana is wide both latitudinal as well as longitudinal [12]. It is a cosmopolitan species inhabitant of coastal brackish waters and saline lakes. It was first described from brackish-water estuary of the Choctawhatchee Bay, Florida [1]. and after that, from the large estuary of Chesapeake Bay, Maryland an Virginia [10, 25], from the Baltic Sea [26, 27], from the Apalachee Bay, Florida [12] and recently from a Croatian estuary [28] and from Brazilian tropical waters [29, 30].

In spite of the species was first discovered inhabiting estuarine waters, there are numerous reports of C. choctawhatcheeana from inland saline lakes of Saskatchewan, Canada (Waldsea Lake, Basin Lake and Deadmoose Lake) [8], Nevada, USA (Walker Lake and Pyramid Lake) [3133], California, USA (Salton Sea) [25], La Pampa, Argentina (Laguna La Amarga) [9].

There are also reports of fossil material of C. choctawhatcheeana from the North America (Devil's Lake, Medicine Lake, Moon Lake) and North Africa (Adrar Bous, Nigeria) [8] and San Luis, Argentina (Salinas del Bebedero basin) [11].

Habitat and environmental notes

C. choctawhatcheeana is able to tolerate water temperatures in the range of 10° to 30°C and wide ranges of salinities [1]. The presence in the Baltic Sea, between 3 and 11 ‰ [26, 27], and the Salton Sea, with a salinity of 40 ‰ [25]. demonstrates that C. choctawhatcheeana is tolerant to wide ranges of salinity fluctuation. Wilson et al. [34] in an examination of diatom assemblages from 219 saline and freshwater lakes, found a range of salinity tolerance from 5.14 ‰ to 79.80 ‰ for C. choctawhatcheeana. Prasad & Nienow [12] suggested that salinity in excess of 20 ‰ coupled with temperatures in excess of 25°C might be detrimental to its growth. Recently this species has been found in Apalachee Bay, an oligotrophic bay system in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico [12], in a karstic estuary of the Zrmanja River, Croatia [28] and in a tropical coastal lagoon, southeast Brazil [29, 30].

Lake Alchichica environmental characteristics such as its alkaline and saline waters rich in sodium chloride, large amounts of carbonate-bicarbonates, magnesium and sulphates, correspond to the type of habitat described previously for the species [17].

C. choctawhatcheeana of Lake Alchichica was found in an ample depth range from 20 m down to 50 m. Conductivity (K25) ranged between 13.3 and 14.5 mS cm-1 and the pH between 8.8 and 10.0. Water temperature fluctuated between 14.5 and 20°C. Dissolved oxygen ranged from anoxic (non detectable) up to saturation (7 mg l-1). Alchichica is an oligotrophic lake [7, 35] with low nutrient (N-NH3 between non detectable (n.d.) and 0.98 mg l-1, N-NO2 n.d.-0.007 mg l-1, N-NO3 0.1–1.0 mg l-1, P-PO4 n.d.-0.54 mg l-1) and chlorophyll "a" concentrations (mean < 5 μg l-1).

In 2001 year C. choctawhatcheeana showed low densities (0–48 cells ml-1) along the time when the water column of the lake is mix (January and February) and nutrients are available for phytoplankton growth (Figure 4). From March to May, when the lake begins the stratification process, an increase in density (0–139 cells ml-1) was observed. Maximum densities (7–3877 cells ml-1) were found from June to October, along the stratificated period of the lake. During the first months of this period, the higher densities were observed near the surface (between 2 and 15 m depth), but at the end of the stratification (September and October) the maximum density values were at 40 m depth, maybe due to the sedimentation process of the cells. In this year C. choctawhatcheeana seemed to have an important role in the development of the deep chlorophyll maximum observed in the lake at the end of the stratification. The stratification season in Lake Alchichica showed a phosphorous limitation at the epilimnion, nonetheless C. choctawhatcheeana developed high densities, specially at the level of the metalimnion (20–40 m).
Figure 4

Spatial distribution and seasonal variation of C. choctawhatcheeana densities(cel mL-1) in Lake Alchichica 2001.

Discussion

Morphology of Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana

C. choctawhatcheeana described by Prasad [1] is often misidentified as C. caspia Grunow [3639]. Furthermore, Maidana & Romero [9] stated that C. choctawhatcheeana is related to a group of species widely distributed in saline continental and marine waters named by Hakanson et al. [27] as the "C. striata complex". Carvalho et al. [8] found that the species occurring in saline lakes (recent and sub-fossil North American material) were quite different from C. caspia. They studied material closely resembling C. choctawhatcheeana already described [1]. This species had a colliculate external central area and one to several fultoportulae in the central area, whereas C. caspia has a smooth external central area with numerous (13–40) valve-face fultoportulae [27, 8].

C. choctawhatcheeana and C. hakanssoniae are validly described species, however, considered as synonym [3, 26, 27]. The only difference between both taxa is that C. choctawhatcheeana forms chain-like colonies meanwhile C. hakanssoniae is single celled [1, 3, 27].

Morphological features of the Alchichica population examined are similar to those considered in descriptions [1, 8, 9, 12] (i.e. size, distribution of marginal fultoportulae, lower number of central fultoportulae, number of satellite pores of the marginal and central fultoportulae, position and morphology of the rimoportula, central area of the external view, and presence of small siliceous granules) (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of the morphological characteristics of Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana from Alchichica with other authors.

 

Alchichica

Prasad et al. (1990)

Maidana omero (1995)

Carvalho et al. (1995)

Diameter μm

4.9–12

3.5–9.5

3–10

6.9–10.6

Striae per 5 μm

12–14

10–13

10

9–12

Marginal fultoportulae

every 2, 3, 4 costae

(7–14 per valve)

every 3 or 7 costae

(5–14 per valve)

every 3 or 7 costae

every 2, 4 costae

Number of satellite pores of marginal fultoportulae

2

2

2

2

Central fultoportulae

2, rarely 3

1, rarely 2–3

1–6

2–6

Number of satellite pores of central fultoportulae

3

3

3, occasionally 2

3

Marginal rimoportula

1

1

1

1

Central area of external view of valve

with tangential undulations and colliculate

with tangential undulations and colliculate

with tangential undulations and colliculate

colliculate

Silica granules in the marginal area of valve external view

with granules

with granules

without granules

with granules

The Alchichica material differed from C. choctawhatcheeana of Prasad's original diagnosis in that in the Lake Alchichica the valves exceeded the diameter (5–12 μm) given for the type material of C. choctawhatcheeana (3.0–9.5 μm), and it does not forms or seldom forms short chains (2–3 cells) in contrast of up to 20 cell chains. The presence of the small silica granules around the margin of the external view of the valve irregularly distributed meanwhile in Prasad's diagnosis a ring of siliceous granules is present near the valve margin; it has been suggested that this differences could be attributed to early stages of speciation, as this widely distributed species could be adapted to local conditions [12]. All other features were within the range of variation described by the authors previously mentioned. The correct identity of this small species is essential, because it could affect the results and conclusions of present and future studies, since it is apparently a very widespread species [10].

Environmental data

C. choctawhatcheeana inhabits several similar North American water bodies. It has been found in Pyramid and Walker Lakes in Nevada. The ecological traits of both lakes are similar than those of Alchichica: they are hyposaline, alkaline and deep lakes. They are also monomictic lakes where C. choctawhatcheena and the filamentous diatom Chaetoceros elmorei are found together. Remarkably, in the three lakes the filamentous cyanobateria Nodularia spumigena is also an important phytoplankton species, developing blooms along the summer season [31, 32].

In Alchichica, during the 2001 year, the higher densities were observed from September to November, when a thermal stratification was present in the lake and nutrient concentration at the epilimnion was very low. In contrast, Oliva et al. [7] found the higher C. choctawhatcheeana densities in Alchichica Lake along the 1998 year from January to March, during the mixing season. In other saline lakes, for example in the Walker [40], diatoms usually are dominant along fall and winter, as was observed in Alchichica. It can use nutrients along the water column during the mixing period, but when nutrients in the upper layer are scarce, C. choctawhatcheeana can be located in very high densities into a well defined depth, the metalimnion, where light intensity is low but nutrient concentrations are high. Due to it small size, the contribution of C. choctawhatcheeana to phytoplankton biomass in lake Alchichica is low, but it could be an important food resource for the lake's zooplankton.

Conclusion

The morphology of C. choctawhatcheeana from Alchichica corresponded to the original description, with exception of the size, chains formation and arrange of the silica granules on the valve. C. choctawhatcheeana can grow in different seasons and with high and low nutrient availiability, being an important contributor to the depth chlorophyll maximum (DCM) present in the stratification period. The species seems to be a small size but significant component of the phytoplankton in the saline Mexican lake Alchichica.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based on was supported by Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, UNAM grant 210806-3, and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología grant 41667-T. We thank Laura Peralta and Luis A. Oseguera (FES Iztacala, UNAM) for field assistance, Jaqueline Cañetas (Institute of Physics, UNAM) for her skilful assistance with the SEM and Nora I. Maidana (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Buenos Aires) for her observations on the photographic material from C. choctawhatcheeana. This paper greatly benefited from the comments and critical revision of the manuscript of Sarah J. Davies, University of Edinburgh, Sarah E. Metcalfe, University of Edinburgh and, J. Platt Bradbury. We thank Ann Grant for her valuable comments and correction of the language. Finally, we thank the critical comments of two anonymous reviewers that great improved the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Morphology and Function Research Unit FES Iztacala, National Autonnomous University of Mexico (UNAM)
(2)
Tropical Limnology Research Project, UIICSE. FES Iztacala
(3)
Enrique A. Cantoral-Uriza. Algae Ecology Group. Ecology and Natural Resources Department. Faculty of Sciences, UNAM. Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria. Coyoacan

References

  1. Prasad AKSK, Nienow JA, Livingston RJ: The genus Cyclotella (Bacillariophyta) in Choctawhatchee Bay, Florida, with special reference to C. striata and C. choctawhatcheeana sp. nov. Phycologia. 1990, 29: 418-436.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Håkansson H: Cyclotella striata complex: tipification and new combinations. Diatom Research. 1996, 11: 241-260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Håkansson H: A compilation and evaluation of species in the general Stephanodiscus, Cyclostephanos and Cyclotella with a new genus in the family Stephanodiscaceae. Diatom Research. 2002, 17: 1-139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Håkansson H, Kling H: Cyclotella agassizensis nov. sp. and its relationship to C. quillensis Bailey and other prairie Cyclotella species. Diatom Research. 1994, 9: 289-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Meyer B, Håkansson H: Morphological variation of Cyclotella polymorpha sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia. 1996, 35: 64-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Saros JE, Fritz SC: Changes in the growth rates of saline-lake diatoms in response to variation in salinity, brine type and nitrogen form. Journal of Plankton Research. 2000, 22: 1071-1083. 10.1093/plankt/22.6.1071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Oliva MG, Lugo A, Alcocer J, Peralta L, Sánchez MR: Phytoplankton dynamics in a deep, tropical, hyposaline lake. Hydrobiologia. 2001, 466: 299-306. 10.1023/A:1014578024049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho LR, Cox EJ, Fritz SC, Juggins S, Sims PA, Gasse F, Battarbee RW: Standardizing the taxonomy of saline lake Cyclotella spp. Diatom Research. 1995, 10: 229-240.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Maidana NI, Romero OE: Diatoms from the hypersaline "La Amarga" lake (La Pampa), Argentina. Cryptogamye Algologie. 1995, 16: 173-188.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper SR: An abundant, small brackish water Cyclotella species in Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. A century of diatom research in North America: A tribute to the distinguished careers of Charles W. Reimer and Ruth Patrick. Edited by: Kosiolek JP, Sullivan MJ. 1995, USA: Koeltz Scientific Books, 133-140.Google Scholar
  11. González MA, Maidana NI: Post-Wisconsinian paleoenvironments at Salinas del Bebedero basin, San Luis, Argentina. Journal of Paleolimnology. 1998, 20: 353-368. 10.1023/A:1008016821250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Prasad AKSK, Nienow JA: The centric diatom genus Cyclotella, (Stephanodiscaceae:Bacillariophyta) from Florida Bay, USA, with special reference to Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana and Cyclotella desikacharyi a new marine species related to the Cyclotella striata complex. Phycologia. 2006, 45: 127-140. 10.2216/05-13.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Adame MF, Alcocer J, Escobar E: Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass and its implications for the dynamics of an oligotrophic tropical lake. Freshwater Biology. 2008, 53: 22-31.Google Scholar
  14. Macek M, Vilaclara G, Lugo A, Alcocer J: Lago de Atexcac. Las Aguas Interiores de México: conceptos y casos. 2007, Compiled by De la Lanza, Guadalupe E, Hernández PS. Mexico: AGT Editor, SA, 199-212.Google Scholar
  15. Alcocer J, Lugo A, Vilaclara G, Sánchez MR, Escobar E: Water column stratification and its implications in a tropical, warm monomictic, saline lake Alchichica, Puebla, Mexico. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie. 2000, 27: 3166-3169.Google Scholar
  16. De Buén F: Investigaciones sobre ictiología Mexicana. An Inst Biol Univ Nal Autón México. 1945, 16 (2): 475-532.Google Scholar
  17. Brandon RA, Maruska EJ, Rumph WT: A new species of neotenic Ambystoma (Amphibia, Caudata) endemic to Laguna Alchichica, Puebla, Mexico. Bull Southern California Acad Sci. 1981, 80: 112-125.Google Scholar
  18. Escobar-Briones E, Alcocer J: Caecidotea williamsi (Creustacea:Asellidae), a new species from a saline crate-lake in the eastern Mexican Plateau. Hydrobiologia. 2002, 477 (1–3): 93-105. 10.1023/A:1021013132626.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliva MG, Lugo A, Alcocer J, Cantoral EA: Cyclotella alchichicana sp. nov. from a saline Mexican lake. Diatom Research. 2006, 21 (1): 81-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. American Public Health Association Washington (APHA): 1985, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
  21. Wetzel RG, Likens GR: Limnological Analyses. 2000, Springer-Verlag, Nueva YorkView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hasle GR, Fryxell GA: Diatoms: Cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society. 1970, 89: 469-474. 10.2307/3224555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Anonymous: Proposals for standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft. 1975, 53: 323-354.Google Scholar
  24. Ross R, Cox EJ, Karayeva NI, Mann DG, Paddock TBB, Simonsen R, Sims PA: An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft. 1979, 64: 513-533.Google Scholar
  25. Lange CB, Tiffany MA: The diatom flora of the Salton Sea, California. Hydrobiologia. 2002, 479: 179-201. 10.1023/A:1016550205461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wendker S: Cyclotella hakanssoniae sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae)-eine kleine Cyclotella-Art aus dem Schlei-Ästuar (BRD). Nova Hedwigia. 1991, 52: 359-363.Google Scholar
  27. Håkansson H, Hajdu S, Snoeijs P, Loginova L: Cyclotella hakanssoniae Wendker and its relationship to C. caspia Grunow and other similar brackish water Cyclotella species. Diatom Research. 1993, 8: 333-347.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Burić Z, Kiss KT, Ács É, Viličić D, Caput MK, Carić M: The occurrence and ecology of the centric diatom Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana Prasad in a Croatian estuary. Nova Hedwigia. 2007, 84 (1–2): 135-153. 10.1127/0029-5035/2007/0084-0135.Google Scholar
  29. Melo S, Torgan LC, Menezes M, Corrěa JRJD: First report of Cyclotella choctawhatcheeana (Bacillariophyta) from brazilian tropical waters: ultrastructure and ecology. Eighteenth International Diatom Symposium. 2–7 September 2004. Poland. Edited by: Witkowski A. 2006, Biopress limited Bristol, 293-299.Google Scholar
  30. Melo S, Bozelli RL, Esteves FA: Temporal and spatial fluctuations of phytoplankton in a tropical coastal lagoon, southeast Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2007, 67 (3): 475-483. 10.1590/S1519-69842007000300012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Leland HV, Berkas WR: Temporal variation in plankton assemblages and physicochemistry of Devils Lake, North Dakota. Hydrobiologia. 1998, 377: 57-71. 10.1023/A:1003274705074.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Galat DL, Lider EL, Vigg S, Robertson SR: Limnology of a large, deep, North American terminal lake, Pyramid Lake, Nevada, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia. 1981, 82: 281-317. 10.1007/BF00048722.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Galat DL, Verdin JP, Sims LL: Large-scale patterns of Nodularia spumigena blooms in Pyramid Lake, Nevada, determined from Landsat imagery. Hydrobiologia. 1990, 197: 147-164. 10.1007/BF00026947.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson SE, Cumming BF, Smol JP: Assessing the reliability of salinity inference models from diatom assemblages: an examination of a 219-lake data set from western North America. Canadian Journal of fisheries and Aquatic Science. 1996, 53: 1580-1594. 10.1139/cjfas-53-7-1580.Google Scholar
  35. Alcocer J, Lugo A: Effects of El Niño on the dynamics of Lake Alchichica, central Mexico. Geofisica Internacional. 2003, 42: 523-528.Google Scholar
  36. Fritz SC: Twentieth-century salinity and water-level fluctuations in Devils Lake, North Dakota: test of a diatom-based transfer function. Limnology and Oceanography. 1990, 35: 1771-1781.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Fritz SC, Juggins S, Batarbee RW, Engstrom DR: Reconstruction of past changes in salinity and climate using a diatom-based transfer function. Nature. 1991, 352: 706-708. 10.1038/352706a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fritz SC, Juggins S, Battarbee RW: Diatom assemblages and ionic characterization of lakes of the Northern Great Plains, North America: a tool for reconstructing past salinity and climate fluctuations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1993, 50: 1844-1856. 10.1139/f93-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Maidana NI: Fossil diatoms from salinas del Bebedero (San Luis, Argentina). Diatom Research. 1994, 9 (1): 99-119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Cooper JJ, Koch DL: Limnology of a desertic terminal lake, Walker Lake, Nevada, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia. 1984, 118: 275-292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oliva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement